The case study presents a complex obstacle for a recently established human rights organization that is dedicated to investigating and remedying grave transgressions, including human trafficking, gender-based violence, and prejudice against vulnerable communities. The organization, which stands for a commitment to the highest principles of equality, justice, decency, and compassion, is caught in the middle of a complex moral problem. When assigned a thorough case study as an intern, the methodology must be impartial, rigorous, and firmly grounded in ethical principles. Human rights breaches raise serious ethical questions that are at the core of this case. The problems of human trafficking severely test the organization’s core values, the prevalence of gender-based violence, and the institutionalized prejudice against underprivileged groups. The moral fabric is damaged, necessitating a careful analysis of the events, reasons, and fallout of these transgressions. There are a lot of essential players in this case, including possible offenders, victims of human rights violations, and staff members of the organization, including the intern. Social workers who interact with impacted communities, psychologists who provide assistance and knowledge of the psychological effects of violations, activists who strive for systemic change, and legal specialists who handle the complexity of human rights legislation comprise the workforce. The case is critical because it can protect vulnerable groups’ rights and dignity by addressing injustices they have experienced. It also must ensure that people in charge are held accountable for their deeds. Selecting utilitarianism as the ethical paradigm offers an analytical framework for the situation. Based on the idea of enhancing pleasure or well-being overall, utilitarianism is consistent with the organization’s values of equality, fairness, and compassion (Smart, 2020). Utilitarianism emphasizes harm reduction and justice promotion, and it asks for acts that contribute to the greatest advantage for the greatest number of individuals in the framework of human rights. In this instance, utilitarianism is used via a careful analysis of the outcomes connected to several options. Through a thorough assessment of the effects on victims, the larger community, and the long-term prevention of human rights abuses, the organization is able to provide solutions that uphold its values while optimizing the well-being of everyone. Under the utilitarian perspective, equality, justice, dignity, and compassion become vital. The American Psychological Association (APA) Code of Conduct is used to support the ethical analysis even further. This code acts as a compass, offering moral principles that align with the organization’s values of equality, justice, dignity, and compassion. APA Code of Conduct principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, honesty, and professional responsibility provide further ethical concerns. Adhering to psychology-specific ethical standards with excellent care is necessary for implementing the APA Code of Conduct. Confidentiality must always be maintained while collecting data as an intern. Respecting people’s right to privacy and dignity, especially those who may have been victims, aligns with this ethical need. The APA Code of Conduct’s guiding principles of beneficence and non-maleficence are essential in determining how decisions are made. As an intern, I am committed to increasing the victims’ well-being and making sure that decisions are made with their best interests in mind. In addition, the non-maleficence principle guarantees a careful approach, avoiding any possible damage to the already vulnerable parties involved (American Psychological Association, 2018). This fine line of compromise highlights the intern’s moral obligation to help reach a decision that is both fair and considerate of the impacted parties’ psychological well-being. The ideals of justice, beneficence, and accountability converge when Utilitarianism and the APA Code of Conduct are integrated harmoniously. The APA’s ethical guidelines must be followed when making decisions that aim to maximize overall well-being in order to provide a comprehensive strategy that is both ethically and professionally sound. This integration guarantees a cohesive and thorough consideration of the situation rather than a segregated ethical analysis. INSTRUCTIONS: Specifically, you must address the following criteria: Identify possible solutions to the case. Describe the strengths and limitations of each solution you identified. Recommend a solution from the ones you identified. Then, justify your recommendation as the most ethical solution. Evaluate your recommended solution using various ethical perspectives. Describe the ethical implications of your solution. Submit your project draft as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount