Imagine that you are investigating a string of ATM robberies occurring over the

Imagine that you are investigating a string of ATM robberies occurring over the past several months. You have a suspect under surveillance; however, your supervisor has advised that you cannot continue to follow the suspect each day due to resource limitations. You are needed on other cases. As a solution, you want to track the suspect’s cell phone GPS so that you can still monitor his movements. Is this considered surveillance? Would a warrant be required?
In this Assignment, you explore these questions as you examine the intersection between surveillance, technology, and the law.
In 500 to 750 words, respond to the following:
1. Describe what is considered surveillance.
2. Explain the difference between legal and illegal surveillance.
3. Explain when a warrant is required and when one is not required. Would a warrant be required in the above scenario? If so, explain your rationale for securing a warrant. If not, explain your rationale for why one is not required.
4. Explain how the rapid evolution of technology has affected the ability of laws and court decisions to keep up.
Sources Provided below