Final Paper –Program proposal (Due See Master Calendar ) The final assignment is

Final Paper –Program proposal (Due See Master Calendar )
The final assignment is to prepare a grant/program proposal for a new program at your organization. Although the organization is ultimately responsible for deciding whether to submit any proposal or grant you write, you are strongly encouraged to discuss this assignment with your field supervisor or other appropriate organizational staff to explore whether there is an agency need that could be met through this assignment.
You have two choices for a format. First, (ONLY A FEW STUDENTS DO THIS) you may find and use an actual grant proposal outline, based on an existing Request for Proposals (RFP) and application. This choice is most appropriate if your organization may wish to submit the proposal for funding. Be sure to include the outline/application when you turn in the proposal.

The second alternative (MOST STUDENTS DO THIS) is to use a common proposal format. It must contain the items/sections 1-8, and may contain the other sections. This outline, serving as your RFP, represents a common or “typical” proposal.

Title page (1 pg.)
Abstract (1 pg.)
Introduction/Summary, with a clear statement of the purposes of the program and the problem it is to address (1-2 pgs.) [this section is really an expanded abstract, which describes the entire program]
In this section, you demonstrate your ability to ”develop policies and funding strategies for enhancing services and client quality of life at the organizational and community level” (Comp 5.5), as well as to “Conduct policy practice” (Comp 5.7)
Statement of need (revised based on comments from instructor as submitted Week 10)
Goals and objectives for the program (1-3 pgs.) (revised based on comments from instructor submitted Week 10)
Procedures/Methods, (3-7 pgs.). This section usually includes:
Theoretical reasoning for the program (requires library research – at least three citations are the minimum). This section should include the empirical/evidence-based justification for your intervention or program selection. You also want some theory or conceptual justification for the program. In other words, why do you think the program will work?
This section demonstrates how you apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice. (pb 5.3)
By providing a theory or concept supporting your choice, this is where you attempt to show that you are able to select appropriate methods of advocacy, organization, and trauma-informed social change to promote social and economic well being (pb 5.6).
2. Agency descriiption. This section describes the agency, and will include much of the information from the capacity assessment assignment. This section should include
The agency mission, brief history, and brief administrative structure (and any other descriiptive information you wish from the Capacity Paper).
How this new program will “fit in” to the existing structure and policies..
3. Program tasks and/or Methods of service delivery. Here, you are describing how you will implement the project. Often, describing it chronologically will be the best approach.
4. Responsibilities and key staff
5. A budget and budget narrative (1-3 pgs.)
6. Evaluation plan (1.5 to 3 pgs.). Here you provide a plan to evaluate both outcomes & processes. To do this:
You must provide a plan to demonstrate the degree of success for at least one outcome objective (in a real proposal you need a plan for all, but here one well written example is adequate). This must include a method (how you will collect the data), a descriiption of your measure, and how you will know if the objective has been met. This is where you will demonstrate your ability to select and use appropriate methods for evaluation of outcomes (pb9.1).
You will also provide a plan for ongoing monitoring of the process. This could include satisfaction surveys, focus groups, or quality control by reviewing documents. This is where you will demonstrate your ability to critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate intervention and program processes and outcomes (pb9.3)
This section must include at least two citations that provide a justification for some aspect of the evaluation, such as the variables, concepts, and theories you will examine in your evaluative research.This section demonstrates how you Use empirical literature to identify variables, concepts, and theories to evaluate practice.(pb 9.6)
APPENDICIES (OPTIONAL)
Program deliverables (1/2 pg.) – this means what reports will be written, and what will you do with the reports (optional for the class assignment)
Appendix (? pgs.), including a logic model
Timeline (optional for the class assignment)
Letters of support (optional for the class assignment)
Resumes (optional for the class assignment)
I have attached the goals and objectives paper, which was perfect the only comment he made was make sure to never use I in the proposal.
Please note I may need to add to this paper in the form of a power point presentation to go along with this paper, However it was be narrated, this class is online so the teacher has never met me in person or heard my voice however I am a black African American male, so let me know if this is possible to do.
the requirements for the power point are below.
A narrated PowerPoint video (5-7 minutes) is also required to be uploaded. The format is up to you, but generally will include:
A title page with the name of the organization and project
A page showing a few bullet points about the problem to be addressed
A page showing the goals/objectives.
A page showing a few key numbers from the budget & the timeline.