The articles generally represented that a reporter had performed independent tests that demonstrated the efficacy of the weight loss products. The websites also frequently included a Consumer Comment section, where purported consumers praised the products. There were no consumers commenting, however, since this content was invented. See this module’s assigned textbook reading for a synopsis of the LeadClick case. Based on this case, the module resources, and your own experience, answer these questions: Who has or should have primary responsibility for managing fake news and its consequences (i.e., social media companies, advertising companies, business, everyday citizens, government authorities, or others)? Why? Is it unethical for a company to allow its ads to run on a controversial website—such as one that is promoting untested scientific data or one that includes what is commonly accepted as hate speech—even if doing so generates significant revenue for the company? Explain your position. In your response posts to your peers, share your own viewpoints and experience. 2.To complete this discussion, please base your work on Enron, WorldCom, or another white collar crime story of your choosing. Name the company you selected and briefly summarize the crime. Do you think that the CEOs and other corporate officers involved were justly held criminally responsible or not? Explain your perspective. Do you believe that business can regulate itself to act ethically, or is government oversight a necessity to protect the public from financial wrongdoing? Explain your position. Respond to at least two of your peers who focused on a company other than the one you selected. Offer your own perspectives on whether the CEOs and other corporate officers involved were justly held criminally responsible or not. To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric. Rubrics
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount