In a concise—1-page—yet nevertheless coherent and well-structured essay, respond

In a concise—1-page—yet nevertheless coherent and well-structured essay, respond to the following prompt:
On p. 105, Baker discusses 5 possible conditions which could be used to distinguish natural objects from artifacts. Describe condition (5) in your own words. Explain Baker’s argument for why condition (5) fails to distinguish natural objects from artifacts. Next, Baker claims that the considerations here suggest that the mind-dependent/mind-independent distinction will “fade away” over time. Do you find this convincing?
make sur you find quotes from the article to support your claim