Answer the following questions. In your own words (i.e., don’t copy and paste f

Answer the following questions.
In your own words (i.e., don’t copy and paste from the reading), what was this reading about? (Here, I’m just asking for the topic, not necessarily the argument. I’m looking to see that you did enough of the reading, even looking at the title and/or abstract, to be able to say what this reading is about. This should be an easy question and quick to answer.)
Ideal Length: You can answer this question with <2 sentences. What was one thing that you found the most interesting about this article? (There is no right or wrong answer here. This is your chance to reflect on the reading and how it impacted you and why. What point(s) grabbed you, surprised you, angered you, made you pause to think, etc.? If you didn't find anything interesting, think about why that is? Was it badly written or really boring, perhaps, or something else? You get points for answering this question, regardless of what you write, as long as you answer the question.) Ideal Length: You can answer this question with 2-6 sentences. You are free to do more if you wish; one sentence would be a bit short for an ideal answer, but please truly answer the question rather than just adding extra words to make it longer. What was something you found the most confusing about this article? (Again, there is no right or wrong answer here. Answering this question is a good way to honestly think about how much you understood from the reading and what might have impeded your understanding. Your answer will also help me figure out patterns in where students might be tripping up so that I can help clarify things that were badly written/explained or for which I did not give you enough background to understand.) Ideal length: 1-6 sentences, depending (basically, enough to make it clear what was confusing and something about why or how it was unclear) Please no chatgpt as this paper will go through chatgpt detectors