I bought the 1st half on this site but one of the citations needed to be “peer r

I bought the 1st half on this site but one of the citations needed to be “peer reviewed” from my school. Ill drop the overview below. I just want one of the 1st 3 entries replaced “Payment of Student-Athletes Hurst Thomas” it should be the 1st one. I have a list posted of “peer reviewed” articles i found available if this helps….. I have a intro paragraph, feel free to make adjustments if you feel you need to. I just want a good grade. I agree that students should be paid and want to reflect that on this paper. I know its alot but if you have any further questions just ask. Thanks in advance!
Suggestions
• “Competitive Nature of NCAA Rules Keeps Student-Athletes from Being Paid.” College Athletics and the Law, vol. 12, no. 8, 2015, pp. 10–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/catl.30146.
• Romo, Lynsey K. “College Student-Athletes’ Communicative Negotiation of Emotion Labor.” Communication and Sport, vol. 5, no. 4, 2017, pp. 492–509, https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516650591.
• Gilbert, Daniel A. “Not (Just) about the Money: Contextualizing the Labor Activism of College Football Players.” American Studies (Lawrence), vol. 55, no. 3, 2016, pp. 19–34, https://doi.org/10.1353/ams.2016.0103.
• Richard, Molly. “More than an Athlete: The Student-Athlete Compensation Debate and Its Potential Tax Consequences on the NCAA.” Suffolk University Law Review, vol. 55, no. 2, 2022, pp. 267-.
• Strauser, Matthew, and Noah C. Chauvin. “Student Athlete Employee Speech.” Virginia Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, 2020, pp. 171-.
• Bertolas, Randy, et al. “Policy Point—Counterpoint: Are Colleges and Universities Obligated to Provide Student-Athletes with Additional Compensation beyond Tuition, Room, and Board?” International Social Science Review, vol. 94, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1–8.
2000-2010
• Haden, Christopher W. “Foul! The Exploitation of the Student-Athlete: Student Athletes Deserve Compensation for Their Play in the College Athletic Arena.” Journal of Law & Education, vol. 30, no. 4, 2001, pp. 673-.
• Brooks, Aaron, and David Davies. “Exploring Student-Athlete Compensation: Why the NCAA Cannot Afford to Leave Athletes Uncompensated.” Journal of College and University Law, vol. 34, no. 3, 2008, pp. 747-.
• Gurdus, Jason. “Protection off the Playing Field: Student Athletes Should Be Considered University Employees for Purposes of Workers’ Compensation.” Hofstra Law Review, vol. 29, no. 3, 2001, pp. 907-.
• McClure, Ann. “Funding Student Athletes.” University Business, vol. 11, no. 3, Professional Media Group LLC, 2008, pp. 16-.
• Haden, Christopher W. “Foul! The Exploitation of the Student-Athlete: Student Athletes Deserve Compensation for Their Play in the College Athletic Arena.” Journal of Law & Education, vol. 30, no. 4, 2001, pp. 673-.
Overview
Project 2 is an annotated bibliography on a topic consisting of six entries of approximately 200 words each. Three sources must be published between 2000 and 2010, and three sources must be published between 2011-2022.
Early Draft
This draft will include your introductory paragraph, the three original bibliographic entries in MLA format.

Final Draft
This draft will include your polished introductory paragraph, the three bibliographic entries revised, and three new bibliographic entries (total of six ) in MLA format.
Make sure to significantly revise all your bibliographic entries before turning in your final drafts.
Final drafts that have not been significantly revised will be lowered one letter grade.
Project Descriiption/Assignment
You will create an annotated bibliography based on the following requirements:
1. An introductory paragraph providing an overview of your topic or historical figure (200-250 words) that
1. Summarizes your topic
2. Explains the major concepts
3. Introduces the historical context and
4. States your research question
2. Six bibliographic entries of 200 words each on your chosen topic or historical figure accompanied by an appropriate MLA or APA citation. Three of your sources must be published between 2000-2010 and three of your sources must be published between 2011-2022. Each entry will include an analysis of the article’s rhetorical situation, succinct summary of the ideas contained in the source, and discussion of each article’s historical context. Each entry should consist of two paragraphs. One paragraph summarizes the source. One paragraph connects the source to the research question and discusses the credibility of the source.
Purpose
In Project 2, you will develop a research process, learn that academic conversations occur within a historical and rhetorical context, and learn how to trace these conversations over time. Your audience for this paper is an audience of academic peers who is less knowledgeable about the subject.
Actions
and guidelines listed above.
Terms You Should Know
• Annotated Bibliography: A list of sources that contains a bibliographic entry, summary, and analysis for each source
• Synthesis: The merging of various articles’ arguments and concepts in order to develop a wider understanding of a topic or historical figure and their historical context
• Analysis: A breakdown of an article’s arguments, concepts, and historical context
• Peer-Reviewed Source: An article written by an expert in a given field that is assessed by other experts in the same field to ensure the article’s quality. The article is then published in an academic journal.
• Historical Context: Facts or writings that surround an event, situation, historical figure, or topic
• Research Question: The question that guides the research you are conducting. The purpose of researching is to answer a proposed research question.
• Rhetorical Situation: The way a text functions as described by the relationship between the writer, audience, and topic