Instructions Film Essay Paper One General Instructions For each of the two pape

Instructions
Film Essay Paper One
General Instructions
For each of the two papers, you will be responsible for watching a film, writing a 3 to 5 page essay in which you respond to prompts (see below), and then providing a list of “My Criteria for Quality in Film.”
THE PROCESS:
Make any and all arrangements necessary to view the films and write about them: Some of the films may be available for streaming via Netflix or another online content provider; others may be available for checkout from your local public library, while others may need to be rented. You are better off watching these films on the largest possible screen, and at the highest possible resolution.
Make Time to Complete the Assignment: Each paper requires you to watch a film IN ADDITION to the ones you will be watching for the week’s discussion, so be sure to leave yourself enough time to: watch the film, think, write a first draft, edit and revise.
Turn your assignments in by their respective due dates to the correct assignment folder in LEO.
THE CONTENT:
These assignments are reaction papers, not plot summaries or research papers. Write what you have to say about the film, not what others have said, but know how the film was made The papers will be graded based on:
a) Evidence that you are reading and viewing the course content, comparisons to other relevant films you have seen (in class and as a movie watcher); use of the film vocabulary introduced in class and college-level writing skills (spelling, punctuation, and grammar).
b) Clear presentation of your opinions and reasonable explanations and justifications to support those opinions: In a 100-level course, you would perhaps be asked to write about what you watched on the screen. In a 200-level course, you are being asked to say what you think about what you watched. In this 300-level course, you should explain why you think the way you do about the film, and then justify your opinions with explanations (using references found in the weekly content in the LEO classroom).
Be sure to correctly spell the names listed in the credits of directors, actors, screenwriters, and other people (to avoid “points” being taken off of the final grade for that paper).
These papers are about your observations, insights and evaluations not only what you can learn by reading up on the film or the filmmaker. Do not just repeat what you find online. Think carefully before you write, be creative and apply what you have been learning in this course.
First Paper Assignment: Film One (F1)
Part 1: View a feature film made between 1940 – 1970 you have not seen before (or will see later in this class) by a great director. Many directors were active both before and after 1970 so make sure you see a pre-1970 FEATURE fiction film.
Suggestion: American directors such as Frank Capra, George Cukor, John Ford, George Stevens, Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder, or William Wyler. Foreign directors such as Ingmar Bergman (Swedish), Luis Buñuel (Spanish), Claude Chabrol (French), Federico Fellini (Italian), Akira Kurosawa (Japanese), Lina Wertmuller (German) or the British team known as “The Archers” made up of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger. For other possibilities, try: this. Comment on the specific film you saw in terms of its genre and the quality of the film itself. Pay attention to the camerawork (cinematography) the editing (montage) and the sound (including music). What did you like and what did you dislike? Why do you like the things you like, and why do you dislike the things you dislike? Finally, is the film successful in creating a work of fiction using the craft of filmmaking and considering when it was made? (Note: This is not the same question as whether or not you liked it. It is entirely possible to like a film that you are aware is not very good.)
Part 2: Draw some general conclusions about the work of the director and one of the main actors or actresses. For example let us say you watched the 1962 film Lawrence of Arabia. Did you like David Lean as a filmmaker? Explain your answer. Did you like Peter O’Toole in the role of Larwrence? Why, or why not?
End with your overall impression of the film, including how you see it as an example of the its genre and time period.
PARTS ONE AND TWO SHOULD BE PRESENTED AS A SINGLE ESSAY!
Part 3: On a separate page, insert the heading “My Criteria for Quality in Film.” Under that heading, propose four general statements indicative of your personal taste in movies. These statements should be numbered (1) through (4), and they should be written as complete sentences or a short paragraph. For example, if you commented in your essay that you liked the acting because it was realistic and you liked the scriipt because it had a happy ending, you could propose these two statements as criteria for quality: “(1) Excellent movies feature realistic acting. (2) A movie is more likely to be good if it ends happily.” Think about and then explain what words such as good, excellent, and effective actually mean. Be sure to save your “My Criteria” page to your hard drive—you will be resubmitting an expanded version of it with for the second paper later in this course.
Due Date
Nov 12, 2023 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Paper 1: Rubric
Criteria
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Weak
Criterion Score
ORGANIZATION Is the essay clearly structured following the assignment guidelines? Is each area fully developed and equally supported? Does the structure follow a logical sequence?
20 points
The essay is clearly organized, with equally supported and fully developed areas of the assignment. Essay possesses a clear, logical structure.
15 points
The essay is generally organized and clear. Each area is developed, but one or more areas may require more support and/or exploration.
10 points
The essay is loosely organized. One or more areas are underdeveloped and/or lacking support.
5 points
There is no clear structure in the essay. The writing exhibits repetition or irrelevant areas. One or more areas is underdeveloped or missing.
Score of ORGANIZATION Is the essay clearly structured following the assignment guidelines? Is each area fully developed and equally supported? Does the structure follow a logical sequence?,/ 20
EVIDENCE/ANALYSIS Does the essay offer substantial and specific evidences/analyses from film to support claims?
20 points
The essay has plentiful, detailed, and substantial relevant evidence from the film chosen for analysis to support claims.
15 points
The essay offers substantial
evidence/analyses to support the argument.
10 points
The essay offers evidence/analysis, but is could be more complete or relevant.
5 points
The essay heavily relies upon opinions/preferences rather than on analysis supported by specific evidence from the film.
Score of EVIDENCE/ANALYSIS Does the essay offer substantial and specific evidences/analyses from film to support claims?,/ 20
RESEARCH Does the essay illustrate a clear understanding of techniques of cinematography, sound, and editing? Does it engage with the appropriate course readings and lectures?
20 points
The essay represents exceptionally thorough and careful work. Each of the techniques is fully addressed and illustrates a clear grasp of the concepts. Distinct references to course materials are present in the work and are appropriately utilized
15 points
The essay represents a more than adequate amount of work. Each of the techniques is addressed and illustrates an understanding of the concepts. Relevant course material are referenced and they illustrate an understanding of the techniques.
10 points
The paper represents a minimum, but still adequate amount of work. Each technique is addressed, but not done so in a comprehensive manner. Relevant course material is referenced, but illustrates only a basic understanding of the techniques.
5 points
The paper is seriously deficient in terms of the quantity of work it represents. One or more analysis of technique is lacking or absent. A basic understanding of the techniques is not apparent in this writing.
Score of RESEARCH Does the essay illustrate a clear understanding of techniques of cinematography, sound, and editing? Does it engage with the appropriate course readings and lectures?,/ 20
TERMINOLOGY/STYLE Does the essay use proper film terminology? Is the essay free from typographical and grammatical error?
20 points
The paper is free from mechanical defects and shows a sense of personal style, too. Discussion is coherent and film terminology excellently used.
15 points
The paper is largely free of mechanical errors. Film terminology is used appropriately.
10 points
The paper contains some errors in grammar, syntax and/or spelling. Some film terminology, but lacks clarity.
5 points
There are significant lapses in grammar, syntax, spelling and/or presentation.
Film terminology is only slightly used or used incorrectly.
Score of TERMINOLOGY/STYLE Does the essay use proper film terminology? Is the essay free from typographical and grammatical error?,/ 20
OVERALL How does the essay measure up to college standards and work to be expected by this point in the course?
20 points
The paper is superior in quality.
15 points
The paper represents solid, credible, and very good work.
10 points
The paper represents solid, credible, and very good work.
5 points
The paper is significantly
below what we expect in a college course.
Score of OVERALL How does the essay measure up to college standards and work to be expected by this point in the course?,/ 20
Grammar
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Weak
Criterion Score
Grammar
25 points
All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling
18.75 points
Most sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes a few errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling, but they do not interfere with understanding
12.5 points
Most sentences are well constructed, but they have a similar structure and/or length. The author makes several errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding.
6.25 points
Sentences sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are difficult to understand. The author makes numerous errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding
Score of Grammar,/ 25