part 1: Carefully describe what it means to be a responsible art critic. Specifi

part 1:
Carefully describe what it means to be a responsible art critic. Specifically, what is the role of participation in art criticism? Also, briefly describe a situation (imagined or real) where someone is engaging in irresponsible art criticism. (75 words)
In your own words, explain the three kinds of criticism. (75 words)
From this week’s reading, choose ONE of the works depicted in either Figure 3-3, Figure 3-6, or Figure 3-7. Then, in 250-300 words total, offer the following as best as you can:A descriptive criticism of the work
An interpretive criticism of the work (you’ll need to Google the work you chose to learn a bit more about it, and you can borrow an art critic’s ideas as long as you put them in your own words)
An evaluative criticism of the work
Part 2:
For full credit, you must fully address the prompt without any appeals to relativism. What I mean by this is that you cannot say anything like, “It depends on who you ask” or “It’s totally subjective.” Regardless of the truth of the matter, pretend like this is an objective matter, offer your opinion where asked, and stand behind it by justifying it. Also, you have to answer the question fully in your first post, or I can’t give you credit for this. Remember that according to our readings, the three criteria for determining whether something is a work of art are that:The object or event is made by an artist
The object or event is intended to be a work of art by its maker
Recognized experts agree that it is a work of art.
First, take a look at the monalisa portriat by Marcel Duchamp and answer the following questions to 100 -150 words:Is it art, according to the three criteria listed above? You will probably need to do some Googling to address the third criteria (about recognized experts).
Now, is it art, according to YOU? Briefly explain your judgment.