Read Fenwick Mark, Joseph A McCahery, and Erik P. M Vermeulen. “The End of ‘Corp

Read Fenwick Mark, Joseph A McCahery, and Erik P. M Vermeulen. “The End of ‘Corporate’ Governance: Hello ‘Platform’ Governance.” European Business Organization Law Review, vol. 20, no.1 (2019), pp. 171–199 (linkLinks to an external site.). In the introduction, the authors observed that: “Traditionally, corporate governance has emphasized the ‘primacy’ of shareholders – i.e., the economic, legal and moral owners of a company. Over time, policymakers have imposed measures on firms designed to compel the other actors within a company—mainly directors, executives, and managers—to act in the best interests of the shareholder-owners. Corporate governance measures were intended to protect the interests and control of those at the ‘top’ of the hierarchy (i.e., shareholders), and other considerations were of secondary importance. Moreover, the discourse and practice of corporate governance was an adaptation to – and a product of – a world of centralized, hierarchical organizations, primarily large corporations. This governance approach worked best when large corporations were the primary engines of economic growth, but it makes much less sense in an age of flatter, innovation-driven platforms.” You are tasked to carry out a study on the corporate governance models that digital platforms like Meta Inc. (formerly Facebook Inc.), Uber Technologies Inc., and FTX Trading Limited have implemented in the past five years. Following this, you will reframe the situation from the perspective of innovation and sustainability. Based on your findings, you will write a research report that recommend a more efficient and sustainable corporate governance model for these digital platform companies. You are required to undertake research to locate academic references using online databases (e.g. EBSCO, Proquest, Emerald, Science Direct etc.) and need to use at least 20 academic references. rubrics – Responds originally, clearly and directly to the question. Good evidence of original insight. Evidence of selection of high quality information/ references. The work demonstrates a high level of understanding and curiosity in analysing the question and task requirements have been clearly and effectively addressed. – Material is deployed in a disciplined way and demonstrates a sophisticated comprehension of key issues of debate. Advanced ability to critically review, analyse, synthesise and apply theoretical and technical body knowledge in a broad and creative way to a range of areas and diverse contexts. – A strong connection between and use of literature to build an argument. – Highly developed and appropriate structure. References consistently conform to the appropriate conventions. Meaning is communicated clearly and effectively through consistent and sophisticated use of academic style, unambiguous language and correct and appropriate grammar, vocabulary, punctuation and spelling. – Excellent reference list in terms of quantity and quality. Highly effective citation in text, both in terms of style and content.