So this may seem long, but it is not! Basically answer two of the questions from

So this may seem long, but it is not! Basically answer two of the questions from the Module 3 section below. The instructions for the commentary paper are below. I will attach the articles that you can use as citation resources. Thank you for your time!
NATURE OF THE COMMENTARY PAPERS:
Students are required to submit three commentary papers for this course. For each of the five modules there are a series of five commentary questions. Student must answer TWO of these questions (two questions from the same module) in each commentary paper. The answer to EACH question should be 900 – 1200 words in length (about 3 – 4 pages). Answers are required to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject matter in each module as well as critical thinking related to the application of these concepts. Students are required to use the assigned materials of the course in these answers as appropriate in order to demonstrate their knowledge of the concepts. All commentary papers must be properly cited as academic essays. Further detail, including the grading rubric, is provided in the “Course Supplement” found in the online classroom.
Module 03: The Euro and Foreign Economic Policy
Purpose:
Required Readings:
• Keukeleire and MacNaughtan – Chapter 9
• Supplemental Readings (see links at left and in the “supplemental readings” folder • Dixon 2011 (html)
• Farrell and Quiggin 2011 (html)
• Feldstein 2012 (html)
• Le Cacheux 2010 (pdf)
Discussion Prompt:
Discussion postings are required to meet the discussion posting criteria found in the syllabus and the Course Supplement. Grades are assigned based on the grading criteria described in the Course Supplement.
How does the crisis over the Euro demonstrate the challenges of a “multi-speed” approach to integration? Do the challenges to the Euro represent a significant threat to the process of integration in the EU? Could a Greek exit from the Euro significantly harm the EU project as a whole?
Commentary Paper Questions:
Commentary papers are required to follow the guidelines for commentary papers listed in the syllabus and the Course Supplement. Grades are assigned based on the grading criteria described in the Course Supplement.
1. How does the crisis of the euro demonstrate the relationship between internal and foreign policy in the EU? Does the euro crisis suggest that there is a fatal weakness in the EU capacity to engage in collective foreign policy? Support your answer with evidence from the class materials. 

2. Le Cacheux argues that the euro area faces significant challenges due to the heterogeneity of the Euro Area. Is the complexity described in the management of the euro more complex than the collective governance in other areas? Does the euro’s role as a common currency make collective governance harder than in other areas of policy? Using the framework discussed by Le Cacheux, can the EU solve the inherent problems of collective governance in the current crisis? Support your answer with evidence from class materials. 

3. The euro crisis impacts many countries outside the Euro Area. To what extent does the crisis in the euro undermine other efforts the EU has undertaken to spread its influence? Does the crisis in the euro weaken the soft power of the EU? Support your answer with evidence from class materials.
4. The Euro Area represents only a portion of the EU, making EU responses more complex. Would the EU response to the current crisis in the Eurozone be more effective if all EU member states also used the euro? Does the balkanized nature of the current EU make collective action within EU institutions more difficult? Could these problems be reduced through institutional changes in the EU and the Eurozone? Support your answer with evidence from class materials. 

4. The generally weak responses to the euro crisis are often chalked up to the weakness of the various governments and their leaders. How accurate is this criticism? To what extend do the institutions of the EU and the Eurozone make this a structural crisis as much as a political one? If the institutions were better designed for crisis management, would the leaders of the Eurozone have responded to the crisis more effectively?