Instructions
Your assignment is a case analysis. First, choose ONE case that you wish to analyze from those which appear below. Each case presents an ethical dilemma. If you’re at all confused about the dilemma in the case you choose, make an appointment to discuss it with me.
Your paper should be divided into 3 separate sections.
Section I. Each case ends with a decision to be made. First, putting yourself in the role of the person making the decision, indicate your key decision options. What basic choices do you have? In stating your decision options, please avoid imagining a solution that would solve the ethical issue in the case, as the purpose of this case is to assess your ability to apply accurately the ethical perspectives. Second, do a stakeholder analysis that lists the stakeholders affected by the decision, and include an explanation of how the decision would affect each stakeholder.
Note: Do not summarize the case in your paper. Assume the reader knows the content of your case.
Section II. Analyze your decision options from ethical standpoints. Apply each of three main perspectives discussed in the course for making an ethical decision: utilitarianism, profit maximization, and universalism. You are free (and encouraged) to apply others discussed in the Deckop Chapter as well. But you must apply the three main ones. Indicate what each perspective would say is the ethical course of action and why. Be sure to refer to your stakeholder analysis when discussing the utilitarian decision in the case. ( See Week 5 for the Deckop Chapter, “Theoretical Bases for Analyzing the Ethics of a Decision.”)
Please subdivide this section into 3 subsections – In one subsection discuss what utilitarianism would say is the most ethical choice. In the second, discuss what profit maximization would say is the most ethical choice. In the third, discuss what universalism would say is the most ethical choice.
Section III. Indicate which of your decision options presented in Section I you would choose, and the degree to which it is consistent/inconsistent with each ethical perspective. Be as detailed as possible in describing the decision you would make and/or the action(s) you would take. If one or more of the perspectives disagrees with your decision, indicate why you do not choose to follow the guidance of that perspective(s). Say what is wrong with the perspective for you, either in the context of this decision, and/or for you in general.
Suggested length — 6-8 double-spaced pages, Times New Roman 12 pt. font and 1 inch margins.
Requirements: 6-8 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph along with a conclusion paragraph
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount