How is it measured or what kind of statistics are used?

Dear writer,
The topic for the literature review is ( the economic consequences of climate change in Europe )
There are some requirements or tips that may help you. (as well I also uploaded two documents to help you know my English skill. Could you have similar levels as me, please? thanks )
With the following instructions:
– your review is on three journal articles(the journal should be reliable I think because it includes the requirements, and those journals should be found by ourselves(google scholar and others).
– your review addresses the following questions: How are the economic consequences
of climate change defined/treated in these three articles? How is it measured or what
kind of statistics are used? And what can you say about the overall consequences of
climate change in the country or region of your choice?
This assignment builds on the earlier academic skills we exercised and discussed before: 1.
academic integrity, plagiarism, and (in-text) referencing; 2. writing skills: introduction and
reading list. It consists of the following steps: read the three articles carefully, make a text
plan.write introduction (using 2) and conclusion, check carefully the used literature for the way
they are referenced (1 and 2). Number of words: about 1000 (800 – 1200 words). Provide a
word count at the end of the review. Use typeface Times Roman, font size 12pt. Double-space
between the lines. Use margins of 2.5 cm (or 1 inch) on all sides. Do not justify lines. Put a
running head and page number on each page. Make sure every paragraph is indented, except
of course in the first line of a new section. check the work with the assessment criteria provided below.
Assessment criteria:
Content
– All references of the used literature correctly referred to in the main text
– References correctly included in the reading list (at the back)
– Structure (including clear demarcation/description/definition of the topic)
– Critical evaluation of studies (addressing ‘move 2 and 3’ of Dudenhefer as much as you can,
using the questions above: what did these studies contribute to our knowledge, and what did
they fail to address/fail to clarify)
– Well-argued
Language
– Divided in paragraphs
– Paragraphs are well-connected
– Sentences are well-connected
– Readable
– Spelling mistakes
– Grammar mistakes
– Style Mistakes
Have a nice day, thanks