Enhancing Communication Through Intentional Eye Contact: A Reflection

ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see Purdue University’s APA Style Guide
Links to an external site. for more information). Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment’s page.
For this assignment, please consider the following:
How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending and receiving clear messages from your friends and family members?

Reflection Assignment Rubric 75
Reflection Assignment Rubric 75
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 30 pts
Excellent
The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. 24 pts
Good
The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. 13.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). 0 pts
Unacceptable
The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning 30 pts
Excellent
The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. 24 pts
Good
The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. 13.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. 0 pts
Unacceptable
The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing, Grammar and Mechanics 15 pts
Excellent
The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 10.5 pts
Good
The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 7.5 pts
Acceptable
The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 4.5 pts
Unacceptable
The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement.
15 pts
Total Points: 75

📌 Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Writing a strong reflection paper requires organization and a clear understanding of the assignment requirements. Follow this step-by-step guide to structure your paper effectively and meet all grading criteria.

Step 1: Format Your Paper Correctly

Your reflection should follow APA format and include the following four sections:

1. Title Page

   • Centered title (bolded and in title case)
   • Your name
   • Course name and number
   • Instructor’s name
   • Date

2. Abstract (150-250 words, optional unless specified)

   • A summary of your reflection, including the main ideas you will discuss.
   • Keep it concise but informative.

3. Main Body (1-2 pages)

   • Introduction (1 paragraph): Clearly introduce the topic and briefly state what your reflection will cover.
   • Body Paragraphs (2-3 paragraphs):
     • Address the prompt directly by explaining how you will use your eyes intentionally in communication.
     • Relate your reflection to course material, theories, or concepts.
     • Use real-life examples to support your thoughts.
   • Conclusion (1 paragraph): Summarize your main points and discuss any final thoughts or insights.

4. References (on a separate page)

   • Include any sources cited in APA format.
   • Use the Purdue University APA Style Guide for correct citations.

Step 2: Address the Grading Criteria

To score highly, your reflection must:

✅ Demonstrate understanding – Explain key concepts, use correct terminology, and provide examples.
✅ Show critical thinking – Make connections between ideas and discuss nuances in the topic.
✅ Be well-written – Use proper grammar, spelling, and logical organization.

Step 3: Proofread and Edit

Before submitting:
🔹 Check for grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
🔹 Ensure your ideas flow logically.
🔹 Verify your references are formatted correctly.

Following this guide will help you structure your reflection effectively and meet all rubric expectations. Good luck! 🎯

ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER NOW