attached are the book pages. please answer all questions. Week 6 Homework (50 points)
(10 pts) What is the difference between form of payment and financing? Name three examples of each.
(5 pts) Why might the seller prefer to be paid in stock and the buyer prefer to pay in cash?
(10 pts) According to your text, “Share-for-share deals yielded average excess returns of +14.5 percent to investors, while cash deals yielded +90.1 percent.” Why does form of payment make such a big difference in returns to shareholders? Name each reason and explain each one.
(10 pts) On page 577 in your text, a hostile tender offer of IBM to Lotus Corp using a “preemptive strategy” is presented. Discuss what might have happened—in detail—if IBM had offered a standard 30% acquisition premium instead of the 100% acquisition premium.
(10 pts) On page 693 of your text, it states, “In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, the Court said that the materiality of the news and the resulting obligation to disclose will depend on: 1) significance of the transaction to the company, and 2) probability of the transaction occurring.”Explain what this means.
Explain how a Toehold purchase disclosure protects investors.
Explain what disclosures are required to antitrust regulators.
(5 pts) Proper grammar, full sentences, correct spelling and punctuation, and a neat and professional format with clearly labeled answers are required.
Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!
1. Difference Between Form of Payment and Financing
Question: What is the difference between form of payment and financing? Name three examples of each.
- Form of Payment refers to how the buyer pays for the transaction. This involves the method or mode of paying for a purchase or investment.
- Examples:
- Cash (immediate payment with liquid funds)
- Stock (payment made through shares of the buyer’s company)
- Debt (payment made using borrowed funds, often through bonds or loans)
- Examples:
- Financing refers to how the buyer obtains the funds to make the payment, which can include strategies to raise money for the transaction.
- Examples:
- Bank Loans (borrowed funds from financial institutions)
- Issuing Bonds (raising funds by offering bonds to investors)
- Equity Financing (raising funds by selling ownership stakes or shares of the company)
- Examples:
2. Seller Preferring Stock Payment & Buyer Preferring Cash Payment
Question: Why might the seller prefer to be paid in stock and the buyer prefer to pay in cash?
- Seller Preferring Stock: The seller might prefer stock payment because:
- They may believe in the future growth potential of the buyer’s company, thus valuing the potential appreciation in stock price.
- It allows the seller to become a shareholder and potentially benefit from future gains.
- Stock payment might be advantageous if the seller wants to avoid paying taxes immediately, as they may not have to recognize the income right away.
- Buyer Preferring Cash: The buyer may prefer paying in cash because:
- Cash payments are straightforward, and they ensure immediate ownership transfer without the complexities or uncertainties that may come with stock-based deals.
- The buyer avoids the risk of having to deal with the future volatility of stock prices, especially if the buyer’s stock might decline in value after the deal.
- Cash payments can be more attractive to the seller if they need immediate liquidity.
3. Why Form of Payment Affects Returns to Shareholders
Question: According to your text, “Share-for-share deals yielded average excess returns of +14.5 percent to investors, while cash deals yielded +90.1 percent.” Why does form of payment make such a big difference in returns to shareholders? Name each reason and explain each one.
- Reason 1: Certainty of Cash
Cash deals offer certainty, as investors know that their holdings will be immediately converted to cash at the agreed price. This reduces the perceived risk and leads to a higher premium on the target company’s stock, boosting returns for shareholders. - Reason 2: Synergies and Value Creation in Stock Deals
In stock deals, shareholders might not see immediate cash but instead benefit from synergies in the merger or acquisition, such as cost savings, revenue generation, or market expansion. However, stock deals tend to involve higher uncertainty and potential dilution, leading to lower immediate returns. - Reason 3: Stock Payment Delays and Potential Downside
In share-for-share deals, the buyer’s stock could be volatile, which means the value of the deal could fluctuate, making it less attractive. Investors may also perceive potential dilution of their ownership stake. Cash payments, on the other hand, provide immediate value and avoid these risks, leading to higher returns.
4. Hostile Tender Offer: 30% vs. 100% Premium
Question: Discuss what might have happened—in detail—if IBM had offered a standard 30% acquisition premium instead of the 100% acquisition premium.
- With a 30% Premium:
- The offer might have been seen as insufficient by Lotus shareholders, who could have rejected the bid.
- A 30% premium could signal that IBM views Lotus as a less strategic acquisition, leading to less shareholder confidence in the deal.
- A hostile bid with a smaller premium might have provoked resistance from Lotus’ management, leading to defensive strategies like poison pills or other tactics to block the acquisition.
- Shareholders may have been less willing to tender their shares, potentially leading to failure in securing control of Lotus.
- With a 100% Premium:
- A much higher premium, such as 100%, likely made the deal more attractive to Lotus shareholders, as they would see substantial immediate gains.
- A 100% premium demonstrates IBM’s strong commitment and belief in the value of the acquisition, making the deal more persuasive and increasing the likelihood of it being accepted.
5. Materiality of Information in Mergers and Acquisitions
Question: Explain what this means: “In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, the Court said that the materiality of the news and the resulting obligation to disclose will depend on: 1) significance of the transaction to the company, and 2) probability of the transaction occurring.” Explain how a Toehold purchase disclosure protects investors. Explain what disclosures are required to antitrust regulators.
- Materiality of News:
- The Court determined that whether a piece of news or information should be disclosed depends on two factors:
- Significance of the Transaction: How important or impactful the transaction is to the company’s future, business operations, or financial performance.
- Probability of the Transaction: The likelihood that the transaction will actually occur. If the likelihood is high, the information is material and must be disclosed.
- The Court determined that whether a piece of news or information should be disclosed depends on two factors:
- Toehold Purchase Disclosure:
A toehold purchase occurs when a buyer acquires a small percentage of the target company’s shares before launching a full acquisition bid. Disclosing this information is important because it ensures that all investors are aware of the potential for a takeover and can act accordingly. Without this disclosure, investors could be left in the dark, potentially losing value on their shares if a hostile takeover attempt occurs. - Disclosures to Antitrust Regulators:
Antitrust regulators require disclosures to ensure that mergers or acquisitions do not create monopolistic or anti-competitive outcomes. Companies must provide detailed information about the deal’s potential impact on competition, market share, and consumer welfare. This ensures that no single entity gains too much control over a particular market.
6. Proper Grammar, Full Sentences, Correct Spelling
Ensure that your homework submission is clear, professional, and error-free. Use full sentences, proper punctuation, and correct spelling throughout your assignment. Make sure the formatting is neat, with clearly labeled answers for each question.
Question: What is the difference between form of payment and financing? Name three examples of each.
- Form of Payment refers to how the buyer pays for the transaction. This involves the method or mode of paying for a purchase or investment.
- Examples:
- Cash (immediate payment with liquid funds)
- Stock (payment made through shares of the buyer’s company)
- Debt (payment made using borrowed funds, often through bonds or loans)
- Examples:
- Financing refers to how the buyer obtains the funds to make the payment, which can include strategies to raise money for the transaction.
- Examples:
- Bank Loans (borrowed funds from financial institutions)
- Issuing Bonds (raising funds by offering bonds to investors)
- Equity Financing (raising funds by selling ownership stakes or shares of the company)
- Examples:
2. Seller Preferring Stock Payment & Buyer Preferring Cash Payment
Question: Why might the seller prefer to be paid in stock and the buyer prefer to pay in cash?
- Seller Preferring Stock: The seller might prefer stock payment because:
- They may believe in the future growth potential of the buyer’s company, thus valuing the potential appreciation in stock price.
- It allows the seller to become a shareholder and potentially benefit from future gains.
- Stock payment might be advantageous if the seller wants to avoid paying taxes immediately, as they may not have to recognize the income right away.
- Buyer Preferring Cash: The buyer may prefer paying in cash because:
- Cash payments are straightforward, and they ensure immediate ownership transfer without the complexities or uncertainties that may come with stock-based deals.
- The buyer avoids the risk of having to deal with the future volatility of stock prices, especially if the buyer’s stock might decline in value after the deal.
- Cash payments can be more attractive to the seller if they need immediate liquidity.
3. Why Form of Payment Affects Returns to Shareholders
Question: According to your text, “Share-for-share deals yielded average excess returns of +14.5 percent to investors, while cash deals yielded +90.1 percent.” Why does form of payment make such a big difference in returns to shareholders? Name each reason and explain each one.
- Reason 1: Certainty of Cash
Cash deals offer certainty, as investors know that their holdings will be immediately converted to cash at the agreed price. This reduces the perceived risk and leads to a higher premium on the target company’s stock, boosting returns for shareholders. - Reason 2: Synergies and Value Creation in Stock Deals
In stock deals, shareholders might not see immediate cash but instead benefit from synergies in the merger or acquisition, such as cost savings, revenue generation, or market expansion. However, stock deals tend to involve higher uncertainty and potential dilution, leading to lower immediate returns. - Reason 3: Stock Payment Delays and Potential Downside
In share-for-share deals, the buyer’s stock could be volatile, which means the value of the deal could fluctuate, making it less attractive. Investors may also perceive potential dilution of their ownership stake. Cash payments, on the other hand, provide immediate value and avoid these risks, leading to higher returns.
4. Hostile Tender Offer: 30% vs. 100% Premium
Question: Discuss what might have happened—in detail—if IBM had offered a standard 30% acquisition premium instead of the 100% acquisition premium.
- With a 30% Premium:
- The offer might have been seen as insufficient by Lotus shareholders, who could have rejected the bid.
- A 30% premium could signal that IBM views Lotus as a less strategic acquisition, leading to less shareholder confidence in the deal.
- A hostile bid with a smaller premium might have provoked resistance from Lotus’ management, leading to defensive strategies like poison pills or other tactics to block the acquisition.
- Shareholders may have been less willing to tender their shares, potentially leading to failure in securing control of Lotus.
- With a 100% Premium:
- A much higher premium, such as 100%, likely made the deal more attractive to Lotus shareholders, as they would see substantial immediate gains.
- A 100% premium demonstrates IBM’s strong commitment and belief in the value of the acquisition, making the deal more persuasive and increasing the likelihood of it being accepted.
5. Materiality of Information in Mergers and Acquisitions
Question: Explain what this means: “In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, the Court said that the materiality of the news and the resulting obligation to disclose will depend on: 1) significance of the transaction to the company, and 2) probability of the transaction occurring.” Explain how a Toehold purchase disclosure protects investors. Explain what disclosures are required to antitrust regulators.
- Materiality of News:
- The Court determined that whether a piece of news or information should be disclosed depends on two factors:
- Significance of the Transaction: How important or impactful the transaction is to the company’s future, business operations, or financial performance.
- Probability of the Transaction: The likelihood that the transaction will actually occur. If the likelihood is high, the information is material and must be disclosed.
- The Court determined that whether a piece of news or information should be disclosed depends on two factors:
- Toehold Purchase Disclosure:
A toehold purchase occurs when a buyer acquires a small percentage of the target company’s shares before launching a full acquisition bid. Disclosing this information is important because it ensures that all investors are aware of the potential for a takeover and can act accordingly. Without this disclosure, investors could be left in the dark, potentially losing value on their shares if a hostile takeover attempt occurs. - Disclosures to Antitrust Regulators:
Antitrust regulators require disclosures to ensure that mergers or acquisitions do not create monopolistic or anti-competitive outcomes. Companies must provide detailed information about the deal’s potential impact on competition, market share, and consumer welfare. This ensures that no single entity gains too much control over a particular market.
6. Proper Grammar, Full Sentences, Correct Spelling
Ensure that your homework submission is clear, professional, and error-free. Use full sentences, proper punctuation, and correct spelling throughout your assignment. Make sure the formatting is neat, with clearly labeled answers for each question.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount