Assingments % - Case Study on a Certified Athletic Trainer

3 page paper 1 separate reference page. Must include 3 references Double spaced 12PT FONT NO AI NO PLAGIARISM You MUST find a court case involving an Certified Athletic Trainer. Summarize the case and determine if it is Misfeasance, Malfeasance or Nonfeasance. You CANNOT use any case involving a Concussion or Brain injury. You CANNOT use the Colter Rios case as this doesn’t involve a Certified Athletic Trainer You MUST site your 3 References

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Structuring and Writing Your Case Study on a Certified Athletic Trainer

This assignment requires you to summarize a court case involving a Certified Athletic Trainer (ATC) and determine whether the case is an example of misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance. Here’s how to approach it step by step:

Step 1: Understand the Key Legal Terms

To determine whether the case involves misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance, it’s important to first understand the definitions:

Misfeasance: This occurs when a person performs an action, but the action is performed incorrectly or improperly. For example, an athletic trainer might perform a treatment, but they do so incorrectly, leading to further harm.
Malfeasance: This refers to performing an act that is illegal or wholly wrongful. An example could be an athletic trainer performing a procedure that is outside their scope of practice.
Nonfeasance: This occurs when someone fails to perform an action they are supposed to do. In the case of an ATC, this might involve failing to provide immediate care when required.

Step 2: Research and Choose a Case

You cannot use any case related to concussions or brain injuries, and the Colter Rios case is excluded. You need to find another relevant case involving a Certified Athletic Trainer that fits the criteria. Once you have found the case, briefly summarize it in your own words.

When summarizing, include:

Who was involved (name of the certified athletic trainer and the athlete or party involved).
What happened (description of the incident or action that led to the case).
The outcome (the verdict or result of the case).

Step 3: Analyze the Case

After summarizing the case, determine which category it falls under (misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance). Here’s how you can approach this analysis:

Evaluate the Action or Inaction: Did the athletic trainer act improperly, make an error in judgment, or fail to act at all when they were supposed to?
Assess the Legal Consequences: What was the legal outcome? Was the athletic trainer found guilty of misconduct or negligence? Did the trainer’s actions lead to harm?
Classify the Case: Based on the legal principles, classify whether the case was an example of misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance.

Step 4: Provide Supporting References

Your assignment requires you to cite three references to support your findings. These could include:

Academic journals, textbooks, or articles that discuss legal cases involving certified athletic trainers.
Legal case studies or databases that outline precedents in the profession of athletic training.
Relevant legal guidelines that help define the different types of professional negligence.

Step 5: Conclude the Case Analysis

Wrap up your analysis by:

Restating the classification of the case (misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance).
Summarizing the key factors that led to the decision.
Providing a brief statement on how this case could impact the practice of athletic training.

By following this step-by-step approach, you will be able to structure your paper logically, clearly, and with sufficient detail to cover all aspects of the case. Always remember to cite your references accurately and adhere to the assignment’s guidelines.

Good luck with your research and analysis!