(Research Project/Paper is attached) Write an (individual) critical analytical

(Research Project/Paper is attached)
Write an (individual) critical analytical discussion of the findings of the research project. Your analytical discussion should be in the context of your research project but should NOT repeat and re-use the findings from the work. The analytical discussion should be written in an individual capacity and should NOT reflect any repeat of paragraphs and sentences from your group project.
 
2. Word limit 1000–1500 words.
More instructions (Dos/Donts)
Write an analysis of your findings as part of the group project research work.
Not repeating your findings means, not doing copy-pasting or/and copying descriptive sentences that you in group work used for the findings from your group project. It means that taking the same findings/results, and in the context of the results/findings, you have to write a separate analysis which will be different in language, content and critical style of engaging with the findings. Moreover, you can also bring back cross-referencing of certain references/articles/books that you used as part of the group project conceptual framework.
Your critical analysis of the findings can have a critical engagement with respect to the literature you had used for the group project, and if any other additional literature you want to bring. Moreover, be careful while you use additional literature, since its always tempting to sound impressive, but using without understanding and meaning it makes no good case!
Moreover, you should keep in your mind that your critical analysis of the findings should be in specifically in the context of the central focus of the research project you had done.
Moreover, you should NOT write the analysis from the methods perspective per se. However, while doing cross-referencing with other literature and analytically placing your findings with earlier or similar studies, you can highlight how the findings in your research context (central focus and methodology you had adopted) are similar or different from the findings of the paper with respect to their central focus and methodology.
But this does not mean that you should write your analysis from a different methods perspective or/say that a different method would have been better. DO Not contradict your methods part in analysis, this analysis is coming out of your research project work. The method you used for the group project should remain unchanged. Moreover, kindly DO NOT bring any new empirical data that you DID NOT USE it for your group project. You should focus on the analysis specifically in the context of your research data (primary or/and secondary) used and the findings based it”