This assessment addresses the following course objective(s): Examine the history

This assessment addresses the following course objective(s):
Examine the history and theories of the development of health care delivery in the U.S.
The United States federal government oversees multiple regulatory aspects of healthcare. For this assignment, you will identify a specific topic from the website www.regulations.govLinks to an external site. and analyze its impact. Then, you will summarize your knowledge for an internal audience, from the healthcare administrator perspective.
PART I – RESEARCH
Navigate to the regulations.govLinks to an external site. website.Learn about the regulatory process here: https://www.regulations.gov/aboutLinks to an external site. and https://www.regulations.gov/learnLinks to an external site.
From the home page https://www.regulations.gov/Links to an external site., search for proposed rules or dockets in a topic area of your interest. This could include quality metrics, reimbursement changes, etc.
All key word results will be displayed. You may use the filter menu on the left sidebar to narrow the selection. Begin filtering results by “agency” such as CMS, HHS, AHRQ, etc. You may also filter by date range, and other options.
Review the results. Select one that interests you, and that you feel would be relevant to share in a presentation with your desired [fictional] internal audience.
Keep in mind, these dockets are open for public comments. Read the comments, and consider the perspectives presented. These comments may be biased or come from places of frustration, or a desire to enact or resist change.
PART II – CREATE AND SUBMIT
Create your PowerPoint presentation
Your role: Hospital administrator
Your audience: Internal stakeholders (this could be a physician group, managers, financial leadership, or any other internal audience of your choosing.)
Length: 10-12 slides of content.
A voice-over narration is required (directions for creating narrated PowerPointsLinks to an external site. )
APA requirements: APA style should be followed throughout. A minimum of three scholarly sources should be used to create this presentation. A title and reference slide should be included.
Presentation Content
While you may include additional relevant points that you believe are important about your selection, make sure that you address the following questions in your presentation:
How does this issue affect your facility/patients/providers?
What changes will your organization need to implement to adapt and move forward, if this ruling is enacted?
Who should be informed and involved with the change management process? (What departments, managers, groups)
Make sure that you speak with both authority and enthusiasm in your narration. Your slides should be visually pleasing and contain assorted visuals, appropriate use of color and varied fonts, imagery, and perhaps data or charts to support your narration. It should be both a professional and satisfying visual and audio experience.
SUBMIT
A media file containing your narrated PowerPoint presentation.
Rubric
BU650 Unit 6 Assignment – Communication of Regulations
BU650 Unit 6 Assignment – Communication of Regulations
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts
30 ptsLevel 5
Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.
27 ptsLevel 4
Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.
24 ptsLevel 3
Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.
21 ptsLevel 2
Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are underdeveloped and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.
18 ptsLevel 1
Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.
0 ptsLevel 0
There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
30 ptsLevel 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
27 ptsLevel 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
24 ptsLevel 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
21 ptsLevel 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
18 ptsLevel 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 ptsLevel 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions
24 ptsLevel 5
The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
21.6 ptsLevel 4
The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.
19.2 ptsLevel 3
The paper exhibits a command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
16.8 ptsLevel 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
14.4 ptsLevel 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 ptsLevel 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
24 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
16 ptsLevel 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
14.4 ptsLevel 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
12.8 ptsLevel 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
11.2 ptsLevel 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
9.6 ptsLevel 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 ptsLevel 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
16 pts
Total Points: 100