Overview For the purposes of this activity, you are currently working as an IoT

Overview
For the purposes of this activity, you are currently working as an IoT systems engineer and are tasked with reviewing the given IoT Architecture Diagram (the diagram is attached below) to determine any errors that may arise in the implementation or usage of the system. By reviewing this diagram, you can inform the IoT architect of the changes that need to be made.
Prompt
Create a document to inform your team of the architectural design errors. In your writing:
Identify at least 3 errors that may arise with the system. You must address the following for each potential error in the design you encounter:
What IoT device is the main component in this error? Are there multiple devices?
Is this design error something that requires a redesign of the system? Why or why not?
Can this system operate and function without addressing this error? Why or why not?
Then provide at least one alternative solution for each potential error you found. It is suggested that you prepare a paragraph for each solution to send to the IoT architect. Explain the potential error and the solution that they can use to alter the diagram. To complete this step, you must address the following for each error:
What do you think is the best solution to address this potential error? What are the device changes or system updates needed to complete this solution?
Does this solution address any issues with confidentiality, integrity, or availability of data within the system? Explain how it does or doesn’t.
What to Submit
Your submission must be a 2- to 3-page Word document (.docx).
Module Six Activity Rubric
CriteriaExemplary (100%)Proficient (85%)Needs Improvement (55%)Not Evident (0%)Value
IoT DevicesExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines all IoT devices affected when addressing the 3 errorsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying devices that are not experiencing any architectural issuesDoes not attempt criterion20
Design ErrorsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines if all 3 potential errors require system redesignShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include does not provide an explanation as to why or why notDoes not attempt criterion20
FunctionalityExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerAnalyzes if the system can operate without addressing the errorsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include does not describe functionality constraints for each of the 3 errorsDoes not attempt criterion10
Solutions to ErrorsExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains viable solutions for each of the 3 potential errorsShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include fails to provide at least one way to solve each of the 3 errors, or provides incomplete solutionsDoes not attempt criterion20
CIA TriadExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerAnalyzes if the 3 potential solutions address confidentiality, integrity, or availability of dataShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include fails to provide at least a short description of the relation to the CIA security measures for each solutionDoes not attempt criterion15
Articulation of ResponseExceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerClearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purposeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas10
Citations and AttributionsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errorsDoes not use citations for ideas requiring attribution5
Total: 100 %