Instructions Explore the psychopathology linked to trauma on the TeachTrauma web

Instructions
Explore the psychopathology linked to trauma on the TeachTrauma websiteLinks to an external site. as included in your readings and choose one of the diagnoses listed. Imagine you are going to provide a training about the diagnosis you chose and the connection to trauma.
Your presentation should include at a minimum: The DSM-V diagnosis criteria
An analysis of the connection of this disorder to trauma At least two evidence-based practices on how you would treat this co-occurring disorder. This presentation may be presented either as a podcast (audio only) or video recording on YouTube or other media player. Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 4-6 hours
Rubric
MSW626 Unit 7 Assignment Rubric
MSW626 Unit 7 Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation (issue/problem/topic)
25 ptsLevel 5
The issue/problem/topic to be considered critically is evaluated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding
22 ptsLevel 4
The issue/problem/topic to be considered critically is composed clearly and described comprehensively, delivering relevant information for full understanding
20 ptsLevel 3
The issue/problem/topic to be considered critically is examined, described, and clarified, so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
17 ptsLevel 2
The issue/problem/topic to be considered critically is described but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
15 ptsLevel 1
The issue/problem/topic to be considered critically is related without clarification or description.
0 ptsLevel 0
The issue/problem/topic is related but ill-defined and/or illogically organized so that understanding is seriously impeded.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence (selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion)
25 ptsLevel 5
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
22 ptsLevel 4
Information is taken from source(s) with adequate interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned.
20 ptsLevel 3
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent interpretation of information. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.
17 ptsLevel 2
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent explanation. Viewpoints of experts are accepted as mostly fact, with little questioning.
15 ptsLevel 1
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts taken as fact without questioning.
0 ptsLevel 0
Viewpoints and information from experts are not identified.
25 pts
Total Points: 5