This is a critical essay of the course of “Science & Values”, is more of a philo

This is a critical essay of the course of “Science & Values”, is more of a philosophy concept. Please first, read the PDF provided thoroughly, and read Professor’s instruction: Critical analysis essay: You are familiar with Richard Rudner’s 1953 paper entitled “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments”. In your essay, please critically assess the 1993 paper by Aaron S. Greenberg and J. Michael Bailey entitled “Do Biological Explanations of Homosexuality Have Moral, Legal, or Policy Implications?” In your assessment, you must do the following:
1. Offer a structure for the text of Greenberg and Bailey (up to 3 points out of 16 points)
2. State clearly and in your own words the main claim of Greenberg and Bailey (up to 4 points out of 16 points)
3. Outline at least two of the arguments that Greenberg and Bailey offer to support their main claim (up to 6 points out of 16 points)
4. Explain the relevance of Rudner’s paper for a critical assessment of the claims and arguments of Greenberg and Bailey (up to 3 points out of 16 points)
5. Be brief and to the point. Write in full sentences. Do not exceed 750 words. Proof-read your essay before submission. Submit as PDF. Give your essay a one-sentence long introduction and a one-sentence long conclusion (1 points deduction if you don’t).
6. Do not cite text of Greenberg and Bailey; use only your words (1 points deduction if you don’t); of course, you may use terminology used by Greenberg and Bailey.
Format of essay in a nutshell:
No “in-text” citations. Use your own words. 750 words maximum. No cover page.12pt font.Times new roman. 1.5-line space.
Here are more information you can look at regarding to this essay, so professor introduce the paper in the last lecture, some screen shot are the PowerPoint slide he provided, but DO NOT COPY, and DO NOT use the same logic for the structure of the essay. Please let me know if you have any questions? Thank you so much for helping me.