There should be 3 essential parts in your review. Part 1: Summary In your own w

There should be 3 essential parts in your review.
Part 1: Summary
In your own words, write a summary of the journal article. It should be 300-500 words long.
Address these questions in your introduction:
(a) Why did you choose this topic?
(b) Why is the topic important and relevant for interpersonal health communication?
(c) How the topic you’ve chosen can be helpful to extend the research on “the topic” itself? For example, if you chose “hospice care,” you have to argue why the journal article you’ve chosen will extend the research about “hospice care” or improve the practical field of “hospice care.”
(d) How the topic you’ve chosen can be helpful to extend the research of “health communication”?
Next, write a summary of the journal article in your body text. You should incorporate these points in your response –
(a) What do the researchers examine/explore?
(b) How do they design the study?
(c) How do they do their data collection?
(d) What do you understand after reading the entire article?
Part 2: Evaluate the journal article (7 questions. (300 – 500 words long)
In this part, you will evaluate the strong and weak sides of the study. To do this, you have to look at each section of the study. Generally, a journal article is divided into several sections: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Method/Design, Procedures, Results, Discussions, Limitations, and Conclusions. Read each section to evaluate the strong and weak sides of the study. Make sure your evaluation has answered the questions below.
You should write the evaluation as an essay. DO NOT “COPY AND PASTE” THE QUESTIONS IN YOUR EVALUATION.
(a) Write the citation using APA format.
(b) How appropriate and clear is the ‘title’ of the article? Look at the abstract. Does the abstract summarize the argument and key findings of the study?
(c) How appropriate are the ‘study design’ and ‘methods’ for the purpose of this study?
(d) Have the ‘procedures’ detailed and clear enough for the reader to replicate them?
(e) How well does the researcher(s) write the ‘discussion’?
(f) What are the ‘strengths’ of the study?
(g) What are the ‘limitations’ of the study? Does it have a “call for future research”?
Part 3: Annotated Bibliography (2×5=10 points) (Each is about 300 words)
Go to your article’s ‘reference section’ and select 2 articles from the reference section for annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a short summary or evaluation of each source the article used. An annotated bibliography should have four essential parts in a single paragraph: (a) a citation, (b) a summary of the major arguments, (c) a justification of the appropriateness of the study, and (d) a description of how the text will further inform the topic (or the study) you have chosen. 
https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/how-to-review-a-journal-article
https://www.uis.edu/learning-hub/writing-resources/handouts/learning-hub/annotated-bibliographies