Hello! What you have to do is 2 reading reports for each of these two philosophi

Hello! What you have to do is 2 reading reports for each of these two philosophical papers on the philosophical aspects of animal minds. It is important to note that each report should be between 180-200ish words. Overall you will come with 2 reports of 180-200ish words on each of the readings below.
Regarding the structure; first state a question about the reading which MUST be conducive to PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSION in a single sentence, ending with a question mark, secondly explain why the question is worth discussing that is identify the pages, passages, or arguments in the reading that made you think about the question, indicating how your question makes sense in the context of the reading, leading you to think critically about the paper. The latter is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, the question must show a clear attempt to clarify, criticize, or probe the reading, the question must show a careful reading of the paper, and MUST NOT contain basic misunderstandings. IT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE FOLLOWING POINTS; THE QUESTION MUST NOT BE ANSWERED OR BE EASILY ANSWERABLE BY THE READING ITSELF AND THE QUESTION MUST TOUCH ON SPECIFIC POINTS OF THE READING. Remember you MUST write up questions you have throughout a careful reading of the material and think CONDUCTIVELY TO PHILOSOPHICAL DISCUSSION.
In order to develop a good report and pertinent questions you must follow the following guidelines. YOU CAN DO TWO TYPES OF QUESTION IN WHICH:
THE QUESTION CAN ASK FOR CLARIFICATION of an important concept or argument in the reading BUT if your clarification is easy to solve or already answered by the reading, it is not a good question.
THE QUESTION CAN BE MORE PROBING IN STYLE, ASKING ABOUT A POTENTIAL IMPLICATION OF THE IDEAS IN THE READING BUT if you develop this type of question, BE CLEAR ABOUT HOW THESE IMPLICATIONS FOLLOW FROM THE READING AND WHY THEY ARE WORTH DISCUSSING.
HOWEVER, IT IS ESSENTIAL YOU GIVE AN EXPLANATION TO DEMOSTRATE WHY THE QUESTION MAKES SENSE, I.E., WHY IT IS A RELEVANT QUESTION THAT ARISES FROM SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE READING.
The two papers are on the philosophical aspects of the SPECIECISM of the animal. Question MUST BE CLEAR, CRITICAL and PHILOSOPHICAL and of course NOT ANSWERABLE BY THE READING. FOLLOW EVERY LINE OF THE GUIDELINES I HAVE UPLOADED.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS THAT YOU DO A QUESTION WHICH IS NOT BROAD AND IS VERY SPECIFIC TO THE READING. YOU CAN’T DO A QUESTION WHICH COULD BE APPLICABLE TO ANY READING TAKING ON THIS TOPIC.