A recurring theme in the chapters on epistemology and ethics has been the dichot

A recurring theme in the chapters on epistemology and ethics has been the dichotomy of reason/emotion.  Various authors have favored either reason or emotion as the most promising source of knowledge, whether knowledge of the physical world around us oror knowledge of morality, what is right or wrong to do in a given situation. Compare and contrast one of the following pairs of authors on this issue, and argue for the view you believe is more convincing/plausible/accurate
I attached a recent paper that I wrote over Rene Descartes and John Locke. It would be great if this format is used. I also have to use sources from “Fifty readings in Philosophy” fourth edition by Donald C. Abel