my professor comments it may help you which is “I would like you to work on find

my professor comments it may help you which is
“I would like you to work on finding examples of independence, imagination, self-expression and revision (of something into something else) in these novels.
One thing that you should realize:
Many critics try to tell us that there was an “idealized” version of the family and domesticity that was prevalent in Victorian society. This is simply not the case. It is a politicized fantasy designed to diminish social relations. Women are not “victims” of marriage as a whole, for example. There are many possibilities, but Lane makes it seem as if there is only one possibility — victimization. I am sure that he has his own political reasons for doing this, but I am not interested in them because they do not help us to read the novels. They turn all of the novels into little stories. They are not little stories. They are complex novels. It is not a good idea to discuss the relationship between someone’s fantasy and a novel. Instead, it is good to look at the way imagination works within the novel.
I encourage you to do that.”
than I send to my proof summaries and question and he said
“Thank you for your summaries of these articles. Your second question and the secondary texts you use to address it are more effective than your first question and the secondary texts you use to address it.
In each case, however, you are missing the specific argument, in the writer’s own words, and you are missing specific important scenes from the novels.
Your answers are too broad and too general. We need to know which scenes are most important to you and why they are important. It is very important that you be very specific. Quote from the secondary sources. Quote from the novels. Set up the drama of interpretation. What you have here is more of a general descriiption.
I will be honest. If you turned this in as a comprehensive exam, you would fail. You have to be much, much more specific, and there has to be a clear and compelling connection between the specific arguments or major points made in the secondary sources and specific scenes and moments from the novels.
Comprehensive exams also often ask you to relate secondary sources to each other, so be aware of that. Dr. Holm often asks questions like that.
See how your sources frame their arguments. See what matters to them, in specific things that they argue and care about. See which parts of the novels matter most to them. Then join in the conversation with what matters to you and the parts of the novels and parts of the arguments that are most compelling to you. Tell us why.
I hope that this helps. I read over all of your sources again (which is why it took a long time), and I do not think that you represented their arguments clearly or accurately.
Revision is a big component of any academic effort, and you need to revise.”
now I rewrite my question which is “what do you this of this question How did the heroines in these novels strive for independence while navigating the confines of their societal roles and confronting prevailing societal norms and expectations? In their pursuit of self-reliance, assertiveness, and both personal and professional autonomy, how does Brontë’s work shed light on the discourse surrounding women’s empowerment during the Victorian era?”
so if you want to use it or write something related to my topic and fit my professor’s comments ahiv5511 ggmmaaiill and let me know if you have any questions