1. Choose only one of the case studies to respond to (see next page). 2. Pretend

1. Choose only one of the case studies to respond to (see next page).
2. Pretend that one of the philosophers or philosophical theories we’ve learned in class are responding to these case studies. Describe how they would respond to this case study (for example, what would be their initial convictions about the matter? What reasons or principles would they use to base their convictions?). In your desсrіption, be sure to make explicit connections to key terms and concepts. Your discussion of these key terms and concepts should demonstrate that you have a clear understanding of their meaning.
3. Throw some complexity to this circumstance as a way to challenge that philosopher’s or philosophical theory’s response. Answer the following questions: What examples might you or another philosopher think of that would challenge those reasons and principles? What counter-arguments or objections might you or another philosopher raise to criticize those reasons or principles?
4. Given this complexity, what is your response to Question #3? Be sure to defend your response in a way that helps to solve some of the complexities you discussed in #3 above.