Write a paper 3–4-page paper concerning common side effects and how to manage these for the psychiatric mental health patient. Include why it is so important to include side effects in informed consent. Following this portion of the document, include an additional 1-2 pages addressing the mini cases listed below. Maintain APA 7th edition formatting as related to spacing, title page, citations, and references. Papers are uploaded through Turnitin plagiarism checker for grade submission. For the following 5 mini-cases, answer the following questions: What is the potential side effect of the medication that will be started? Is this medication appropriate (right med, right dose, right time, right route) for this patient? What would be another medication(s) you could possibly start and the side effects of that medication(s)? Patient 1: 67-year-old female who presents with MDD and GAD. She has been treated with Cymbalta in the past however finds it not working very well and having sadness, insomnia, ruminations, and a sense of impending doom again. She is to be started on Pristiq 50mg. Patient 2: 9-year-old male who presents with ADHD and panic disorder. He is to be started on Adderall XR 20mg at noon. Patient 3: 40-year-old male who presents with Bipolar 1 Disorder and in a manic state after stopping his Abilify for the 3rd time in 8 months. It had been discussed previously to start Abilify Maintena 400mg IM q 4 weeks and will be started today. He has not had PO Abilify for 1 week. Patient 4: 93-year-old female who presents with the recent loss (6 months ago) of her husband of 58 years. She notes trouble sleeping, not being hungry, and sad. She has no previous psychiatric history and is to be started on paroxetine 30mg daily and quetiapine 200mg hs for her recent insomnia. Patient 5: 52-year-old female who presents with MDD. She reports recently going through menopause and having a lot of trouble with irritability and hot flashes. Her current medication is not working like it was before and she will be started on clonazepam 0.5mg bid. Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT. Estimated time to complete: 3 hours Rubric NU675 Unit 12 Assignment – Managing Side Effects Across the Life Span Rubric NU675 Unit 12 Assignment – Managing Side Effects Across the Life Span Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent of Paper 8 pts Level 5 Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. Develops content and theories are well. Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials. Completes all instruction requirements. 6.67 pts Level 3 Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter. Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. Completes all instruction requirements. 3.33 pts Level 1 Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter. Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Presents content but is missing depth and or development. Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements. 0 pts Level 0 Does not meet the Section 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning 8 pts Level 5 Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content. Synthesizes information from scholarly resources. Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints. Completes all instruction requirements. 5.33 pts Level 3 Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources. Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements. Supports content with at least one viewpoint. Completes all instruction requirements. 3.33 pts Level 1 Lacks clarification or new information. Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight. Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete. Completes most instruction requirements. 0 pts Level 0 Does not meet the Section 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Knowledge 8 pts Level 5 Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources. Applies practice that is accurate and plausible. Supports practice with additional scholarly resources. Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation. Completes all instruction requirements. 5.33 pts Level 3 Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained. Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice. Completes all instruction requirements. 3.33 pts Level 1 Lacks objective Section. Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content. Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner. Completes most instruction requirements. 0 pts Level 0 Does not meet the Section 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 8 pts Level 5 Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas. 5.33 pts Level 3 Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement. Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow. 3.33 pts Level 1 Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content. Provides a purpose statement. Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work. 0 pts Level 0 Does not meet the Section 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollege-level academic writing 8 pts Level 5 Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability. Meets the assignment length requirements. 5.33 pts Level 3 Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability. Meets the length requirements. 2.67 pts Level 1 Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability. Meets the length requirements. 0 pts Level 0 Does not meet the Section 8 pts Total Points: 40
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount