Use Singer (see folder for online readings) to explain various attitudes we coul

Use Singer (see folder for online readings) to explain various attitudes we could take towards the environment. Is concern for the environment best justified by a human-centered ethic (or perhaps sentient centered), or perhaps one encompassing a “deep” ecology? What does this have to do with the distinction between instrumental and intrinsic value? What does Singer’s view on the environment have to do with Utilitarianism? Do you agree with Hill (see his article in The Right Thing to Do) that since it would still be wrong to blow up all the plants even if we knew that all sentient life was doomed? Or are environmental problems simply variations on the “Prisoner’s Dilemma?” For example, do you agree with Husak that it is wrong to own an SUV? Which of the environmental ethics discussed by Singer (if any) makes the most sense to you (and why)?
Guidelines: You should critically assess the various ideas and arguments you encounter by (1) stating as clearly as possible the positions and objections, explaining unfamiliar or technical concepts, and, (2) defending your own view through reasoned argument, (you need not agree with Rachels, or myself).
Essays will be evaluated on the basis of the following:
Research: Use only the readings in Rachels’ books (and my lectures) as sources (it should be obvious what readings are relevant, if not, just ask).
Writing: Write intelligibly. This includes everything from spelling and grammar, to structure and style. You must have a POLISHED introductory paragraph which (a) introduces your topic (subject, authors to be discussed, (b) states the problem to be tackled, (c) describes your strategy & how the paper is organized) and (d) provides a THESIS STATEMENT which summarizes your conclusions. You must include a bibliography. You must support your discussion with FREQUENT, SHORT, quotations (<4 lines) - about 2-5 per page in APA style. Argument: (i) State as clearly as possible the problem or issue to be discussed, how it arises, and why it is important. Puzzles, dilemmas, and thought experiments can introduce a topic, as well as help advance a particular argument (ii) clearly and concisely present some alternative explanations or approaches that are available; carefully identify the various positions and arguments of other authors, including specific premises, “hidden assumptions,” and conclusions (iii) make sure that you explain assumptions, unfamiliar technical concepts, principles, and academic jargon in your own words (iv) give short quotations to support your claims (v) critically assess the arguments by (1) using whatever (conceptual or empirical) evidence is available to evaluate the differing alternatives (2) drawing attention to points that seem controversial, or just hard to understand (3) considering possible objections to the premises and hidden assumptions (4) explaining whether conclusions follow from their premises, and (5) acknowledging other points of view. On the basis of the evidence for the different alternatives, make a compelling case for the answer you prefer. Argue for what you see as the best answer to your question (you may or may not agree with me or the authors you discuss). Conclusion: Finally, summarize the results of your discussion. What conclusion(s) have you reached? Are there any surprising consequences for your analysis? What further issues or difficulties does your answer raise? Essays will be graded on the quality of your argument, not on any particular conclusion you might reach. TOPICS: Write a 4-5 page essay (double spaced, 1-inch margins