From each of these readings, identify whether each uses any ethics theory, or a

From each of these readings, identify whether each uses any ethics theory, or a combination, to justify their approach. For each of the readings given, find at least one more that helps supports your definitions, e.g. your definitions of normative theories (Kantian, Deontology, Utilitarianism….), and non-normative (including psychological) theories. Download this template for your analysis. The template has two columns in a table, use the right column to select paragraphs of text from the readings that are rich and meaningful and in the left column, analyse and use this to critically engage and explain your justification for the identification of theories. Avoid writing in dot-point form, construct your sentences in argumentative form. In your analysis, focus on the following questions: Why you think the paragraph is significant? Why you chose the paragraph, i.e. what does it indicate? Critically analyse the selected paragraph against the ethics perspectives. Critically analyse the selected paragraph for normative or non-normative (including psychological) approach to study of ethics. Find other scholarly readings that support your definitions, e.g. that support your above findings. As the name suggested, the purpose of this assignment is to build up your ability to bridge normative theories and scholarly readings, and your critical thinking skill. Consequently, do not memorise or cut and paste answers, but justify critically your recognition of a particular theoretical influence in each of the readings. ————————————————————————- Responds originally, clearly and directly to the question. The work shows good evidence of original insight. Evidence of the selection of high quality information/references. The work demonstrates a high level of understanding and curiosity in analysing the question and clearly addresses the task requirements. Material is deployed in a disciplined way and demonstrates a sophisticated comprehension of key issues of debate. Advanced ability to critically review, analyse, synthesise and apply theoretical and technical body knowledge in a broad and creative way to a range of areas and diverse contexts. Highly effective use of a range of literature to build a strong argument. Highly developed and appropriate structure designed to effectively present argument. Meaning is communicated clearly and effectively through consistent and sophisticated use of academic style, unambiguous language and correct and appropriate grammar, vocabulary, punctuation and spelling. References consistently conform to the appropriate conventions. Excellent reference list in terms of quantity and quality. Effective citation in text, both in terms of style and content.