Unit 16 [panel2] Introducing neoliberalism Reading and fully understanding is re

Unit 16 [panel2] Introducing neoliberalism
Reading and fully understanding is required to answer the 3 questions: 
NO OUTSIDE OR SECONDARY SOURCE READING IS ALLOWED, ALL THE ANSWERS AND COMMENTS HAS TO STRICTLY BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 3 ASSIGNED READINGS.
IF THE TEACHER HAS A QUESTION OR A CONCERN ABOUT YOUR ANSWER/COMMENT, HE WILL SENT BACK A REPLY AND YOU HAVE TO REPLY BACK TO HIS COMMENT.
16. W July 7 [panel Neoliberalism: introduction and critiques
S. R. Waldman (2020) Interfluidity 1 May 2020
David Harvey 2007. Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1): 22-44.
Mike Konczal et al (2020 Roosevelt Institute
Note: Waldmans piece is a blog post, not a scholarly paper, but it does a good job of setting out some features of markets that are salient to neoliberalism and/or critics of neoliberalism. It therefore provides useful background to the readings in this unit as well as units 17-20. Harvey is a Marxist scholar and a well-known critic of neoliberalism; some of his arguments about the practical consequences of neoliberal reforms are updated and expanded on by Konczal. 
Please answer or have some unformal comments/paragraphs (you can say I understood that.. I think that.. I did not understand this specific thing in the reading etc. ) regarding each of the 3 following questions.
question #1: How might defenders of neoliberalism respond to Harvey and Konczal? Are there gaps in their arguments?
Your answer #1:
question #2: What points did you find especially interesting or especially difficult, unclear or confusing, in any of the Unit 16 readings?
Your answer #2:
question #3: Based on the assigned readings, compare and contrast (a) the theoretical arguments for neoliberalism; (b) the rhetorical appeal of arguments for neoliberalism directed at the general public; (c) what Harvey takes to be the real political objective of neoliberalism (as opposed to its utopian theoretical objective)? In what sense is this real objective redistributive rather than generative?
Your answer #3: