I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ have failed in assignment that has been writien by another

I‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ have failed in assignment that has been writien by another writer and it was a horrible. I want you to edit all me supervisor notes and make it better. use the same topic that I have choosen (Project Title: The effectiveness of home-to-stay smartphone app in preventing hospital readmissions among congestive heart failure patients: A rapid review of systematic reviews.) I will upload my assignment with my professor’s feedback. I got a second chance from my prof so I don’t want to miss it. You will find all the doucments that you will need in the attachment. Also he has sent to me a form to clarify every note that has been writtien in the feedback, like note number one and what I didi to fix it. PLEASE use australian resources as much as possible. and only systematic review. You will find in the attachment an example of my friend assignment and another file contains a the assignment structure. **this is my prof messege; I am sure you will be disappointed with your grade but more effort was expected here. Although your proposal identifies an important topic the focus of your Background is too broad and fails to establish the importance of your work. In addition you are required to undertake a Rapid Review of Systematic review, yet you submitted a protocol for a syst‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ematic review this is not correct. More specifically, justification to conducting a rapid review to summarise evidence from systematic reviews is that there are systematic reviews already published on this topic. You were therefore required to provide a summary and references of the reviews that are already published and discuss their limitations and how your project is going to address these limitations. You used several references that are not evidence based and therefore not appropriate for your Proposal. In addition, your project Criterion 2 (worth 40%) was not addressed at the expected level. While the key components of the Rapid Review methods section are described you were expected to use references to support the elements of your PICO. Your Search strategy is poorly developed and this will potentially impact on the quality of the studies that you identify and then the results. Please look at examples of proper search strategies in systematic reviews/ protocols that have been published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews or Joanna Briggs Institute or the example on the Moodle site – this has significantly affected your mark in Criterion 2. See additional feedback in your assignment Improve on the identified areas for your next Assessment task submissio‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍n