Greetings, Please read the attached articles and answer the questions below in s

Greetings, Please read the attached articles and answer the questions below in short answer form. You should demonstrate a serious engagement with the text(s), all claims you make should be fully and completely explained, and claims about what the text says should be backed with quotations and/or evidence from the text. Be sure to provide enough reference information in your post so that it could be found by page/quotation/etc. The name of the author and a page number should be enough. If you refer to any materials outside of the course, provide full reference information so that we could find the item, though, again, that information need not be in a formal citation format. Please see example below. Tremain (2001) says that both “natural sex” and “natural impairment” are historical artifacts from what she calls the “regime of knowledge/power” (p.623). Tremain (2001) gives the first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary as evidenced, because in it there is no entry for “gender” that describes it as a counterpart to “sex” (p.623). In addition, Tremain (2001) also brings in the issue of intersex, which was what introduced the term “gender” to mean the psycho-social aspects of sex identity (p.623). Tremain (2001) discusses the sex-gender paradigm, and says everybody has a gender identity that is detached from their sex (p.624). Tremain (2001) makes a connection between the distinction of sex/gender to the distinction of impairment/disability in the social model of disability. As an example, Tremain (2001) discusses intersexed people who undergo “corrective” surgery, but do not qualify as disabled (p.630). The author also says that even though impairment is a prerequisite of disability, not all persons with impairments are disabled and that disabling factors are placed upon people with impairments which disadvantages them. Therefore, Tremain (2001) claims that the strict division between impairment and disability in the social model “is in fact a chimera” (p.631). Furthermore, the author says that the field of disability studies and the disability movement will have to contend with the growing paradox of contemporary identity politics (p.635). In closing, Tremain (2001) argues that people with disabilities need to unite and change their language and focus from defining “who” is disabled, to verbalizing “what” it is we are demanding and what it is we want (p.635). Tremain (2001) sides with Foucault in that the problem is centered around how “to liberate ourselves both from the state and the type of individualization that is linked to the state” (p.635). Study Questions: Cejas, Diana 2020. “Taking Charge of My Story as a Cancer Patient at the Hospital Where I work.” Disability Visibility. 104-112 Q1. How does Cejas’ account of being a patient and medical resident connect to both disability prejudice and institutional and structural ableism? Bogdan, Robert, and Steven J. Taylor. 1989. “Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness.” Social Problems 36 (2): 135–48. Q1: What is Bogdan and Taylor’s criticism of traditional “stigma” theory? Q2: What factors allow non-disabled people in accepting relationships to attribute humanness to their severley disabled loved ones? (Q3: What do Bogdan and Taylor say about whether non-disabled people who attribute thinking to their disabled loved ones are “‘delusional'”?) Q4: How can their research help to liberate people with disabilities? Bogdan, Robert, and Taylor, Steven. 1987. “Toward a Sociology of Acceptance: The Other Side of the Study of Devinace.” Social Policy 18: 34–39. Q1: What are Bogdan and Taylor’s criticisms of traditional stigma or labeling theory? Q2: What is the “sociology of acceptance”? Q3: What four major orientations toward the disabled person did Bogdan and Taylor find in accepting relationships? Q4: How are accepting relationships typically formed? Q5: What background conditions tend to foster caring relationships? Krahé, Barbara, and Colette Altwasser. 2006. “Changing Negative Attitudes Towards Persons with Physical Disabilities: An Experimental Intervention.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16 (1): 59–69. Q1: What did the study show about whether and how attitudes toward physically disabled people might be changed?