From the story of King Hezekiah
Brief History, his family, His Temperament, His Leadership figure
A. What to learn from the story of Hezekiah:
1. individual,
2. Family
3. Church
B. What our political leaders can learn from Hezekiah
The Links Below are Video summaries of the BIBLE book:
2Kings 16-21, 2 Chronicles 28-36, and Isaiah 36-39
Part 1. https://youtu.be/L3UZCf3JjeY
Part 2. https://youtu.be/IjwRPr9v258
Part 3. https://youtu.be/2BsLy35xHMM
Category: Religion and Theology
From the story of King Hezekiah Brief History, his family, His Temperament, His
From the story of King Hezekiah
Brief History, his family, His Temperament, His Leadership figure
A. What to learn from the story of Hezekiah:
1. individual,
2. Family
3. Church
B. What our political leaders can learn from Hezekiah
The Links Below are Video summaries of the BIBLE book:
2Kings 16-21, 2 Chronicles 28-36, and Isaiah 36-39
Part 1. https://youtu.be/L3UZCf3JjeY
Part 2. https://youtu.be/IjwRPr9v258
Part 3. https://youtu.be/2BsLy35xHMM
give a brief summary of 2 Chronicles 20:1-22 with emphasis on verses 21-22. This
give a brief summary of 2 Chronicles 20:1-22 with emphasis on verses 21-22. This should be written as if it you were preaching before a congregation, and the approach should be in simple terms.
Students will write a two-page, double-spaced, paper reflecting on what was said
Students will write a two-page, double-spaced, paper reflecting on what was said by the guest lecturer. These papers should be 1 page summary and a 1-page response
Write 500 or more words!
Please the Essay should be from the interview!
Professor instruction:
Listen to one interview for JUDAISM
https://encountersofwisdom.com/category/judaism/interviews-judaism-judaism/
What ideas about JUDAISM you read about do you see reflected therein?
Also, discuss ONE text from the Novak book.
Write 500 OR MORE words!
Your paper SHOULD NOT HAVE MORE THAN 5 % SIMILARITY ON TURN IT IN! DO NOT PLAGIARIZE…if you inspire yourself give the sources!
The book’s name is World’s Wisdom: Sacred Texts of the World’s Religions 1994
Author: Novak, Philip.
This paper will be tested for any sort of plagiarism, so it has to be original.
UMass university.
This paper will be tested for any sort of plagiarism, so it has to be original.
This is an exegetical paper on a passage of the Bible (NIV) and this is for my class: “encountering Romans”
Write a response essay (800-1000 words) which is a report of your reading a comp
Write a Response Essay (800-1000 words) which is a report of your reading a complete scripture found in ONE OF THE FOLLOWING – DN, MN, SN, or AN under ‘TIPITAKA’ at https://www.accesstoinsight.org/. You can also use the published translations: The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha. Tr. by Bhikku Bodhi. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2012. The Long Discourses of the Buddha. Tr. by Maurice Walshe. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1995. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. Tr. by Bhikkhu Nanamoli & Bhikkhu Bodhi. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society, 1995. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha.Tr. by Bhikku Bodhi. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1999. Make sure you include all the necessary information about the scripture you have chosen.
0-12: paper shows evidence of insufficient or inappropriate research, is off-putting in its approach, is dismissive of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes little to the learning objectives of the course.
tudents will select a person from Church History between the years 1500 and 2000, preferably someone we have not covered in class and write a 5-7-page paper.
Evaluation Rubric:
18-20 points: Paper shows evidence of excellent and comprehensive research, is creative in its approach, is respectful of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes significantly to the learning objectives of the course.
13-18 points: Paper shows evidence of sufficient or appropriate research, is mundane in its approach, is ignorant of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes somewhat to the learning objectives of the course.
0-12: Paper shows evidence of insufficient or inappropriate research, is off-putting in its approach, is dismissive of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes little to the learning objectives of the course.
**Note please pay special attention to Rubric
After reading paul: his life and teaching, pages 340-350, and the article “one new temple in christ,” write an essay of at least 750 words in apa format that describes how paul supports his emphasis on the equality of jewish and gentile christians and how that theology aligns with christ.
After reading Paul: His life and teaching, pages 340-350, and the article “One New Temple in Christ,” write an essay of at least 750 words in APA format that describes how Paul supports his emphasis on the equality of Jewish and Gentile Christians and how that theology aligns with Christ. Your essay must have at least 1 citation from the textbook, 1 from the article, and 2 Scripture passages from the writings of Paul.
0-12: paper shows evidence of insufficient or inappropriate research, is off-putting in its approach, is dismissive of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes little to the learning objectives of the course.
tudents will select a person from Church History between the years 1500 and 2000, preferably someone we have not covered in class and write a 5-7-page paper.
Evaluation Rubric:
18-20 points: Paper shows evidence of excellent and comprehensive research, is creative in its approach, is respectful of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes significantly to the learning objectives of the course.
13-18 points: Paper shows evidence of sufficient or appropriate research, is mundane in its approach, is ignorant of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes somewhat to the learning objectives of the course.
0-12: Paper shows evidence of insufficient or inappropriate research, is off-putting in its approach, is dismissive of the viewpoints and opinions of others (both historical figures and classmates who may represent them), and contributes little to the learning objectives of the course.
**Note please pay special attention to Rubric