Your document should be 2–3 pages plus a reference page. Overview For this assi

Your document should be 2–3 pages plus a reference page.
Overview
For this assignment, research best practices in team interactions. Your research should reflect mostly professionally peer-reviewed journal articles. However, if you gather some of the information from an organization′s website, that can be appropriate as well. You may use the SOBTH APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] as a template for your writing. Be sure to focus on competencies for effective team collaboration and team leadership.
Instructions
Conduct research to complete the following. In a Word document, address the following:
Analyze characteristics of effective team leadership.
Examine models of effective team leadership.
Propose interventions to promote collaboration and goal attainment.
Recommend a game plan for team development and conflict resolution within a team.

Your submission should: follow ″email″ format–single spaced, extra line between

Your submission should:
follow ″email″ format–single spaced, extra line between paragraphs; have To/From/Date/Subject at the top
be typed in Times New Roman, 12-point font
be free of spelling or punctuation errors
his competency assessment assesses the following Outcome(s):
HA400M1-1: Analyze ethical principles relevant to current trends and dilemmas in health care.
Assignment Introduction:
You are serving as a practice manager for a multispecialty cancer center. The center has experienced a 20% growth spurt over the past 12 months, increasing the number of physicians and patient volume. However, your approval rate from the executive team to hire additional staff has been slow, impacting your ability to recruit new team members to support this increase in volume. In addition, the new hire recruitment process has increased in length of time, resulting in a minimum 8-week interview through onboard process. Due to short staffing and the slow new hire recruitment process, current clinical support staff, including medical assistants, LPNs, and RNs, are feeling burnt out and disengaged, and are ultimately looking for employment elsewhere. These team members are being asked to support more doctors and handle an increased daily patient volume. In an attempt to streamline the approval and hiring process, you have decided to put together an email highlighting the current issues surrounding clinical staff burnout, disengagement, and turnover and a better staffing plan to support the increase in physician and patient volume.
Assignment Directions:
Put together a 1-page email to the executive team providing:
An overview of the impacts of staff shortages throughout the facility
Describe the increase in staff burnout along with justification for needing additional clinical staff
Explain how ethical management impacts staffing decisions
Cite articles giving data about burnout in the health care field

Topic: Promoting Mental Health & Well Being Among Nursing Staff at NYU Langone H

Topic: Promoting Mental Health & Well Being Among Nursing Staff at NYU Langone Hospital
Section 2 – Program Model, Activities, and Timeline:
Section 2 will include the following parts, which should be clearly labeled in the paper:
● Part A: Goals and objectives of the health program
▪ A1: Process objectives
▪ A2: Outcomes objectives
● Part B: Desсrіption of intervention and program activities
● Part C: Timeline chart (using Excel template) and narrative desсrіption for a timeline of the health program
● The paper should be typed in 12-point font, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced

VoCare Vital signs monitor device operation Important In

VoCare Vital signs monitor device operation
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Overview For Milestone Three, you will address the critical elements in the Eval

Overview
For Milestone Three, you will address the critical elements in the Evaluation of Policy section of your final project and write a letter to the stakeholders involved to describe and defend your proposed policy. Stakeholders could include policy makers, healthcare providers, insurers, and healthcare consumers.
Your letter should include background on the key health issue and your assumption of the positive and negative impacts inferred by existing policies (e.g., unintended consequences or public reaction). The document should not be based solely on emotion, though it should not be divorced of sentiment, as it needs to rouse the proper energy to effect change. The goal of the document is to convince the reader that your proposed policy will improve the U.S. healthcare system in terms of quality, costs, and accessibility.
Submit your analysis in a letter format that you may use to develop speaker’s notes for your final presentation.
Prompt: Write a letter to a stakeholder to describe and defend your proposed policy.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: Evaluation of Policy Discuss the current economic and legal landscape related to your public health issue. To what extent do existing policies (or the lack thereof) have positive or negative impacts to the American healthcare system?
Explain your proposed policy using evidence and examples to illustrate.
What are the specific operational strategies that you believe are necessary for addressing your chosen issue and why? What role do the major healthcare organizations play in your proposed policy? To what extent can their position in the marketplace be harnessed? Defend your proposed policy for addressing the public health issue with specific research and evidence.
How will your proposed public policy improve the American healthcare system in terms of healthcare quality, costs, and accessibility? In what ways is your proposed policy informed by the larger socioeconomic factors that can influence public health?
What to Submit
Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA forma

topic: Enhancing Clinical Handovers Through Integration of Nursing Assessments w

topic: Enhancing Clinical Handovers Through Integration of Nursing Assessments within the ISBAR Framework as a service improvement project
Introduction/Background (1,000 words)
Describe the service improvement initiative. This desсrіptor should include a supporting literature
review that informed and justified the development of your planned initiative. The literature review
should be a concise review of the contemporaneous literature around your particular initiative.
Analysis of Implementing a Service Improvement Initiative (1,000 words)
Analyse the process of implementing a service improvement initiative in the context of change theory
and reflect on your learning experience during the development and implementation of your initiative.
Explore these learning experiences comparing and contrasting significant points from your experience
and the literature relating to change.
Analysis of Managing and Leading Change (1,000 words)
Your assignment should include analysis of: skills necessary to manage and lead change, leadership
development, conflict resolution and analysis of change process, and evaluation of new initiatives.
Discuss lessons learned and what you would do differently next time. Evaluate your success in
implementing what you set out to implement. It may not be possible for you to formally evaluate the
change you have implemented within the time available. However, you are required to consider
evaluation strategies to measure effectiveness of service improvement.

Textbook: Mckenzie, Neiger, and Thackeray (2009) 7th Edition Planning, implemen

Textbook: Mckenzie, Neiger, and Thackeray (2009) 7th Edition Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs.
Article: Adamowitsch : Implementation practices in school health
Read chapter 12 the article by Adamowitsch and formulate 3-6 recommendations for the leadership of the school that participated in those case studies. Base on your recommendations on chapter 12 and be sure they reflect the findings of the article as well.
Book: Mckenzie, Neiger , and Thackery (2009) 7th Edition Planning, implementing , and evaluating health promotions programs.
Article: Busch – Chronic care treatment for smoking cessation in patients with serious mental illness a polit randomized trial. Based on Bush article do you believe that smoking cessation programs with serious mental illness is worthwhile. Be sure to note which findings were statistically significant and which were not.
Reference the articles and the book

Feedback from professor has been received, I need this paper edited and I need c

Feedback from professor has been received, I need this paper edited and I need citations moved around; here is the feedback:
Nice work here but there are some areas needing improvement as well.
First and foremost is your formatting- you have inconsistent fonts in several spaces, and you should be using EndNote to insert your citations- it will make sure that you adhere to the style guidelines for APA.
Your introduction could have more information to clearly illustrate the disparity you are trying to highlight with this paper, and you have some claims missing citations (particularly your first paragraph). What you have is solid, but you can incorporate a lot more background information here.
You have the information you need in your methods for the most part, but your writing here is very verbose. I revised a paragraph as an example, but for further guidance you should consult the examples on ELC for a how-to on a minimalist methods section.
Thematically your results look good, but within each theme you need to do a better job of deliberately explaining the ramifications of what you are citing for individuals of low ses. Similar to your methods, I think you can trim a lot of what is written here- I would focus on clearly laying out the findings of the papers you are citing, and leaving the synthesis/conclusion part to the discussion section. A sentence of this at the end of each theme is okay, but doing it for each paper is excessive- lots of clarification needed. I also only count 11/15 citations here. Make sure that ONLY articles that are cited in your results appear in that table.
Your discussion is solid at this stage, good job highlighting multiple solutions there. My recommendation here is to comb back through and make sure you are being concise as a whole. See the attached for more detailed feedback.
-1 (APA format)
-4 (11/15 citations in results)
-5
15/20
I am attaching the rubric along with an example literature review (my document has comments on it which need to be revised). There will need to be some but minimal research done but all of the sources are given in the excel file attached

Feedback from professor has been received, I need this paper edited and I need c

Feedback from professor has been received, I need this paper edited and I need citations moved around; here is the feedback:
Nice work here but there are some areas needing improvement as well.
First and foremost is your formatting- you have inconsistent fonts in several spaces, and you should be using EndNote to insert your citations- it will make sure that you adhere to the style guidelines for APA.
Your introduction could have more information to clearly illustrate the disparity you are trying to highlight with this paper, and you have some claims missing citations (particularly your first paragraph). What you have is solid, but you can incorporate a lot more background information here.
You have the information you need in your methods for the most part, but your writing here is very verbose. I revised a paragraph as an example, but for further guidance you should consult the examples on ELC for a how-to on a minimalist methods section.
Thematically your results look good, but within each theme you need to do a better job of deliberately explaining the ramifications of what you are citing for individuals of low ses. Similar to your methods, I think you can trim a lot of what is written here- I would focus on clearly laying out the findings of the papers you are citing, and leaving the synthesis/conclusion part to the discussion section. A sentence of this at the end of each theme is okay, but doing it for each paper is excessive- lots of clarification needed. I also only count 11/15 citations here. Make sure that ONLY articles that are cited in your results appear in that table.
Your discussion is solid at this stage, good job highlighting multiple solutions there. My recommendation here is to comb back through and make sure you are being concise as a whole. See the attached for more detailed feedback.
-1 (APA format)
-4 (11/15 citations in results)
-5
15/20
I am attaching the rubric along with an example literature review (my document has comments on it which need to be revised). There will need to be some but minimal research done but all of the sources are given in the excel file attached