Report Requirements: Your report must be typed. Minimum 5 pages of text, maximu

Report Requirements:
Your report must be typed. Minimum 5 pages of text, maximum 10 pages. Double spaced.
A bibliography is required with at least three (3) different types of sources. Do not only use internet resources, this will negatively impact your grade. Do not quote Wikipedia.
Do not plagiarize! You must be able to write a report in your words, interpretation and point of view. Quote and footnote as necessary.

Write an analysis based off of enviornmental issues that invites a close, method

Write an analysis based off of enviornmental issues that invites a close, methodical, examination. Use clear, precise language to describe your subject, explain your findings, and offer your insights.
Write at least 1000–1500 words.
Locate, evaluate, and integrate at least three sources that directly address your subject. Your project will likely require additional research in order to discuss the subject in depth.
Cite and document all sources that you use according to MLA 8th Edition. Cite information that is not common knowledge and when you use someone else’s ideas, arguments, language, or other materials.
Include an accurate list of works cited at the end of your essay. Each entry in your works cited list must be cited in the body of your essay with a signal phrase and/or parenthetical in-text citation that points unambiguously back to that entry.
Add the kind of analysis you are writing to the end of the MLA header, on the line immediately below the date.
Problems to Avoid
Do not select too broad a topic or write a shallow overview.
Do not write to persuade.
Do not use block quotes under any circumstances in this course, and avoid using lengthy direct quotations. (You may present data for a data analysis, but lengthy quotes are not included in the word count.)

Write an analysis based off of enviornmental issues that invites a close, method

Write an analysis based off of enviornmental issues that invites a close, methodical, examination. Use clear, precise language to describe your subject, explain your findings, and offer your insights.
Write at least 1000–1500 words.
Locate, evaluate, and integrate at least three sources that directly address your subject. Your project will likely require additional research in order to discuss the subject in depth.
Cite and document all sources that you use according to MLA 8th Edition. Cite information that is not common knowledge and when you use someone else’s ideas, arguments, language, or other materials.
Include an accurate list of works cited at the end of your essay. Each entry in your works cited list must be cited in the body of your essay with a signal phrase and/or parenthetical in-text citation that points unambiguously back to that entry.
Add the kind of analysis you are writing to the end of the MLA header, on the line immediately below the date.
Problems to Avoid
Do not select too broad a topic or write a shallow overview.
Do not write to persuade.
Do not use block quotes under any circumstances in this course, and avoid using lengthy direct quotations. (You may present data for a data analysis, but lengthy quotes are not included in the word count.)

The Great Salt Marsh In this research assignment, you will be investigating an e

The Great Salt Marsh In this research assignment, you will be investigating an ecosystem of your choice to learn about the system inputs, feedback loops, biodiversity, native plant and animal species, invasive/non-native plant/animal species and their impacts, the effects of human contributions (growth, logging, mining, fishing, agriculture, travel), and the importance of this ecosystem. Ecosystem Chosen: Great Salt Marsh https://www.mass.gov/service-details/great-marsh-acec Write a 3-4 page paper in which you address the following: Define and describe your specific ecosystem. Outline the biodiversity of plants, species, and natural resources. What functions does the ecosystem support (natural and human related)? What resources does it provide? What is the current condition of the ecosystem? Has is degraded or improved over the years? How and why? Why is this ecosystem so important? How does it relate to the health and sustainability of other near by ecosystems? Ecosystem Chosen: Great Salt Marsh https://www.mass.gov/service-details/great-marsh-acec

You have been selected for a Brugger-Adams Foundation scholarship to assess Euro

You have been selected for a Brugger-Adams Foundation scholarship to assess European sustainable housing examples. The foundation pays your complete expenses to study a European site for a semester! You may choose between sites at: Greenwich Millennium Village, BedZed, Vaubon, or BoO1 (not to worry about going to Germany or Sweden, the natives understand that you are an American and will speak English for you). It is important for the B-A Foundation that you immerse yourself totally in this experience and thoroughly analyze the housing development. There is, of course, a catch to this scholarship. The B-A Foundation will expect you to write papers before, during, and after your visit (but for this assignment, you only need to write the before paper). You are asked to evaluate a number of factors as part of this program. These include: Architecture The layout of the buildings Integration of the sustainable community with the rest of the area Planning Performance – does this place really work as a sustainable community Before leaving for the community that you choose, you are asked to write a thorough assessment of your expectations and your research before heading out. This is a challenging assignment. You need to consider who you are – background and experience, as you plan for this program. You need to do as much research as possible (from course materials and internet/library sources) about your selected destination. Finally, you need to project what this experience will be for you: what will you learn, what do you expect while there, what key points do you expect to be able to take back from

Focus on synthesis rather than synopsis. Do not simply recount what was written

Focus on synthesis rather than synopsis. Do not simply recount what was written in the readings. Give the reader (in your own words) a concise overview of the main arguments, themes and concepts.
Describe the major strength of the reading, the major weakness, and give your overall opinion/evaluation of the reading.
Focus on critical thinking.
What points were effective (or not) in supporting the claim/argument and why (or why not)?
Focus on critiquing content over style, organization, and/or execution (rigor over prose).
Are there holes in the argument’s logic?
If you do not have space to rigorously deconstruct the argument (you often won’t) then try posing critical, thought provoking questions.
e.g., What relevant information was left out that should have been included?
e.g., Does this argument apply universally or only within certain contexts?
e.g., Who might take issue with this argument and why?
If you agree with the argument, include your own thoughtful comments in support of the reading’s main points.
Don’t bother criticizing writing style or esoteric terminology (look it up).
Avoid value judgements (good/bad). If you choose to evaluate the reading, then your evaluation should focus on whether the reading was effective and why.
Why do you think this reading was assigned? Why is this reading relevant within the broader context of the course?
How does this reading connect to a previous reading from the course, another reading/resource for the week, readings from other courses, and/or to current events?
Feel free to reflect on your own background and experiences.

1. Research Paper Outline & Research Paper Research Paper must include the

1. Research Paper
Outline & Research Paper
Research Paper must include the following:
·
Background on the
disaster including: location, impact on the community economically and socially
·
Response from local,
state, and federal government
·
Response from
community and outside organizations
·
Communication from
government to residents
·
How response was
conducted based on the established EOP and what can be done better for the next
disaster.

Focus on synthesis rather than synopsis. Do not simply recount what was written

Focus on synthesis rather than synopsis. Do not simply recount what was written in the readings. Give the reader (in your own words) a concise overview of the main arguments, themes and concepts.
Describe the major strength of the reading, the major weakness, and give your overall opinion/evaluation of the reading.
Focus on critical thinking.
What points were effective (or not) in supporting the claim/argument and why (or why not)?
Focus on critiquing content over style, organization, and/or execution (rigor over prose).
Are there holes in the argument’s logic?
If you do not have space to rigorously deconstruct the argument (you often won’t) then try posing critical, thought provoking questions.
e.g., What relevant information was left out that should have been included?
e.g., Does this argument apply universally or only within certain contexts?
e.g., Who might take issue with this argument and why?
If you agree with the argument, include your own thoughtful comments in support of the reading’s main points.
Don’t bother criticizing writing style or esoteric terminology (look it up).
Avoid value judgements (good/bad). If you choose to evaluate the reading, then your evaluation should focus on whether the reading was effective and why.
Why do you think this reading was assigned? Why is this reading relevant within the broader context of the course?
How does this reading connect to a previous reading from the course, another reading/resource for the week, readings from other courses, and/or to current events?
Feel free to reflect on your own background and experiences.

Write 5 critical analysis of different issues (400 words each) 4 sources to be c

Write 5 critical analysis of different issues (400 words each) 4 sources to be cited (sources provided) Write 3 recommendations for each analysis to improve an organizations practice withing this topics. (50 words pr recommendation) The last issue will be avalible 13 dec Example: 1. Critical analyse why organizations are seen both part of the problem, and part of the solution, in adressing biodiversitly loss. 2. Critical analys the role of organizations in building community resiliance to climate change.

The rubric is extremely important. The 3 questions mentioned in the rubric will

The rubric is extremely important.
The 3 questions mentioned in the rubric will need to be deep enough. Make sure the questions are answered correctly and the citations are done well. Please finish answering all the questions then put all the answers in another document as in like an essay please and thank you!