Purpose: The graded activity is to help you think about and process the course

Purpose: The graded activity is to help you think about and process the course materials in a way that promotes creative and critical thinking, as well as active learning. The activities are to ensure that you are getting maximum involvement with the course material. This document details the requirements for completion of the graded activities, a grading rubric, and an example.
A total of five (5) activities are required and represent approximately 20 to30 minutes of work. Excel must be used to produce this assignment. All WGA submitted as Word or PDF will receive an automatic grade of zero.
Attend class, ask questions, and make note of pertinent information; e.g. definitions/explanation of terms or concepts not already familiar with
Read assigned chapter, highlight challenging/difficult concepts that can be added to the study sheet
Consolidate the information gathered from attending class and reading the chapter and prepare the Excel study sheet
Excel must be used, construct the three columns
Add as many rows as necessary to broadly summarize assigned readings and lecture material (minimum of 5 rows)
Rows and columns should be left justified, not centered
Include the column headers provided in the template below
Ensure the headers are bold font
Font should be no larger than 12
Finished study sheet must be a minimum of one (1) page
The end product should result in a study sheet for quizzes, midterms, and the final exam.

In this module, we learned about modern block ciphers. Please research a recent

In this module, we learned about modern block ciphers.
Please research a recent (2020 or newer) attack, preferably one from inside the United States, which was in the news and involved encryption or message confidentiality. Please select an attack that you or someone else in this course has not used in any discussion board postings.
For this discussion, please answer the following questions:
What is the real-world scenario you selected? Please provide a link to the article that you found.
What type of attack was involved and what happened in this incident?
Describe the exact type of attack, how it was launched, what systems were affected, and for how long did it last.
What was the monetary value in terms of cost of loss to whomever was attacked?
What did the organization’s security team do to respond to the incident?
What, if anything, would you have done differently to respond to this event?
In today’s world, are block ciphers strong enough to defend against sophisticated attacks such as that from a nation-state actor using AI and/or very large-scale computing power to break it? What is a real-world example of one such attack from a nation-state actor that has occurred since 2020?
***I’ve attached my previous current event assignments as not to use the same topic when constructing this paper.***

Your boss is concerned that your department may have been negligent in the injur

Your boss is concerned that your department may have been negligent in the injury of a spectator. He has asked you to write a response explaining what constitutes negligence and how the organization can avoid any hint of negligence in the future.
Your assignment should be 3 – 5 pages in length, formatted following APA standard guidelines (double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman).
Text Book: Carpenter, L.J. (2014). Legal concepts in sport: A primer (4th ed.). Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.

For Unit 2, please read
Chapter 5: Negligence: “Oops!”
Chapter 6: Defusing Negligence Liability
Chapter 14: Defusing Liability: Managing the Risks
Additional Material

Please refer to pages 1673 -1676 in the back of your textbook on How to brief a

Please refer to pages 1673 -1676 in the back of your textbook on How to brief a case. You only need to include the sections that are shown on the case brief template.
Assignment Instructions:
Write a case brief on ONE of the following cases:
Husayn v. Mitchell Links to an external site., 938 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2019)
OR
Marbury v. Madison, 1 CR.(5 U.S.) 137 (1803)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/5/137 Links to an external site.
NOTE: If you don’t see what you need in these materials to write your brief, please locate other resources to help you with this assignment. This info will get you started. You may see these cases on exams, so keep you assignments saved to your desktop.
This is all you need to include in your brief. Be sure to read the template: How to brief a case template.docx Download How to brief a case template.docx
The case brief should be submitted in a WORD document. A title page is required. Be sure to include the proper section headings for the case brief. The brief should NOT have a REFERENCE page. The paper should be submitted in 12 point font.
Be sure to review the rubric for the grading criteria for this assignment.
NOTE: There are several online resources such as Oyez that that summarize the facts of the case, the main issue, and decision. I strongly recommend that you DO NOT VISIT these websites and do not use information from these sources to submit as coursework. Use your textbook, the links provided in class, Proquest and our school databases. Contact the librarian for assistance with the NW Missouri library resources.

Michelle needed money to pay her rent. She is behind 3 months in rent and fears

Michelle needed money to pay her rent. She is behind 3 months in rent and fears being evicted. She decides to rob Capital One Bank. Michelle asks her roommate Cheryl to help her. They agree to split the money 60% Michelle and 40% for Cheryl. This was based on the fact that Cheryl was going to only purchase the items necessary to commit the crime, like the gun and ski mask, and agreed to be the lookout at the bank. Cheryl purchased a gun and ski mask early in the week. Midweek, she stopped into the local pub for a few drinks. She began telling the bartender about her plan to get money. The bartender said nothing. Later that week, before the robbery was to take place, Michelle and Cheryl went to get their nails done. While at the nail salon, they were arrested. As the prosecutor, with what crimes can you charge Michelle and Cheryl? Do their actions constitute the crime of attempt? Discuss why or why not. Use legal reasoning to support your response.
2) April and Troy have been unhappily married for years. April wanted a divorce, but Troy feared April would get too much of his money and the marital home. He decided it was best to kill her. He decided to poison her. He went to CVS and inquired of the pharmacist about needing a sleep aid for his insomnia. The pharmacist gave him a bottle of sleeping pills. Troy believed if he gave April several pills in her tea, she would die peacefully in her sleep. She drank the tea, but nothing happened but for a little drowsiness. Troy is charged with attempted murder. Will Troy be found guilty of attempted murder? Discuss why or why not. Use legal reasoning to support your response.
Use Resources (apa) to show understanding

What is “Legality” explain fully. 2. What are: “Common Law Crimes?” Do they stil

What is “Legality” explain fully.
2. What are: “Common Law Crimes?” Do they still exist? If so where.
3. What is the purpose of a Citation?
4. How would you describe each of the sections of citation: 363 US 512 ( -IE: 363…US…and 512 – what does each section mean.)
Required Text – Samaha, J. Criminal Law (2013). Wadsworth Publishing ISBN: 0495095397 ISBN-13: 9780495095392.

What is “Legality” explain fully. 2. What are: “Common Law Crimes?” Do they stil

What is “Legality” explain fully.
2. What are: “Common Law Crimes?” Do they still exist? If so where.
3. What is the purpose of a Citation?
4. How would you describe each of the sections of citation: 363 US 512 ( -IE: 363…US…and 512 – what does each section mean.)
Required Text – Samaha, J. Criminal Law (2013). Wadsworth Publishing ISBN: 0495095397 ISBN-13: 9780495095392.

In this exercise you have been assigned as the lead detective. You must review

In this exercise you have been assigned as the lead detective. You must review the following scenario as well as look up the listed criminal statutes at Florida online statutes.
Statutes to be reviewed: F.S.S. 812.014 Grand Theft
Copy and Paste the link for the Statute: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=grand+theft&URL=0800-0899/0812/Sections/0812.014.html
Responding Officer Narrative:
On Monday 01/29/24, I responded to the area of East 6th Street and Magnolia Avenue, where he made contact with David Cuddy in reference to a report that his gold 2013 Chrysler Town & Country van, bearing Florida tag: EBW123, was stolen by an individual he only knew as “Ace.” Cuddy stated that he had met “Ace” within the last few weeks and that he allowed “Ace” to use the vehicle the previous day, for “Ace” to go to Walmart and spend time with his girlfriend. The only stipulation was that “Ace” return the vehicle in a reasonable time frame. Cuddy allowed “Ace” to have the vehicle on Sunday, 01/28/24, and filed the report after “Ace” hadn’t returned the vehicle on January 28, 2024. During the initial investigation, Cuddy signed an Affidavit of Prosecution for charges against “Ace” and stated he wished to pursue charges. Ofc. J. Thurman
Follow up report #1
I contacted Cuddy on Jan 31, 2024, to follow up with him in reference to his report. Cuddy came to the police department and provided me with several text messages shared between him and “Ace,” during which “Ace” confirmed he was in possession of the vehicle and continually made statements that he would return the vehicle soon and provided false locations where Cuddy’s vehicle was located in the local area.
Follow up report #2
On Feb. 04, 2024, DeFuniak Springs Police Department contacted our agency to advise that their agency recovered the vehicle stolen in this case. Cpl. L. Span took the report and ensured the vehicle was removed from FCIC/NCIC. The vehicle was impounded by DSPD to be recovered by Cuddy. Upon returning to work Monday, February 06, 2024, I contacted DSPD and spoke with Det. White provided me with information that Leslie Cohen was located in the passenger seat of the vehicle, which was parked at a motel in their city. The DSPD report stated that Cohen was not legally in possession of the vehicle as she did not have the keys, and they were not in the vehicle. Cohen was arrested on an oustanding warrant out of Bay County and was being extradited back this afternoon. I will make contact with her at the Bay County Jail to conduct an interview regarding this incident.
****ALSO SEE FILE IN MODULE FOR PHOTOS: they are attached*
There are 3 Parts to this assignment this is the first. The second part will be the Mock Interview Oral Competency portion that will take place in Module 9. The third part will be a critique and feedback discussion board in Module 10.
I. Rubric For Written Plan (5 points) You are to prepare a line of 10 to 15 questions to conduct an interview with the witness Ms. Leslie Cohen. You will want to obtain as much information in your line of questioning to help in identifying the perpetrator as well as meet the elements of the offenses you believe were committed. Written Plan: (5 points) should consist of an Outline Addressing the following Questions and uploaded in the submission area in Module
What initial steps will you take to build rapport with the witness? (.5) pts
What are the legal consideration in this situation? Ethical considerations? 1 pts
What oral communication strategies do you plan to use during the interview? 1 pts
How will you present yourself professionally during the interview? (.5) pts
What are the five most important items you need to determine during the interview and what 10-15 questions do you plan to ask to elicit the information? 2 pts

The book needed to complete this essay is Cases and Materials on Criminal Law b

The book needed to complete this essay is Cases and Materials on Criminal Law by Joshua Dressler and Garvey, 9th ed. West Pub. 2022. ISBN: 978-1647087708
Fully answer all of the following questions. Give reasoned answers in essay form (not bullet points or lists). The expectation is that the exam in total should be between 8-12 pages (based on past similar exams) but that is just a guesstimate. Answers will be graded on analysis of the issues and concepts needed to deal with the hypotheticals. Do your own work — the assignment will be uploaded via SafeAssign, so if you quote something, an in-text citation is OK. 1. a. Read the Greenwalt article from the Dressler text pp. 34-35 and answer questions 1 and 2 on p. 36
b. Read and fully answer Question 4 from p. 42 of the Dressler text.
c . Read Coker v. Georgia from pp. 76-81 and fully answer Questions 1 and 2 from pp. 81-82.
2. a. Discuss causation and its various concepts as discussed in class and the text.
b. In addition, answer the following hypotheticals:
Who is at fault for Y, D, and F’s deaths, and why in the following hypotheticals? Give a reasoned answer using the concepts of causation covered in class and the text.
Hypothetical Facts: X and Y steal property from Z’s riverfront home. The thieves fled in a boat. Z fires two shots at the boat, seeking (unlawfully) to kill or scare them. i. X, fearful of another shot, dives into the water causing the boat to capsize. Y drowns.
ii. The boat – now unmanned – drifts a ½ mile downstream and over a waterfall striking D and killing her as well. Discuss the causation issues and who might be criminally culpable in this scenario. iii. B nearly drowns and is rescued by a passerby (E), who puts him in his car to get him to the hospital. E is intoxicated and crashes the vehicle killing Y and bicyclist F.
3. Do the Problems from Question 2 (A-F) on p. 236 in the Dressler text. Explain the reasoning in your answers and explore the possibilities available.
4. Fully analyze the following problems.
a. Smith, a pedestrian, was struck by a car while walking in a crosswalk and was seriously injured. Jones was driving the car that hit Smith. An ambulance was called to the scene, and Smith was rushed immediately to the hospital. Unfortunately, all of this occurred amid a heavy snowstorm, and on the way to the hospital, the ambulance hit a patch of ice and careened off the road killing the ambulance driver, the EMT, and Smith. Jones has been charged with homicide in the deaths of all three crash victims. Is she guilty of these alleged crimes? Fully explain why or why not.
b. Burr, in a jealous rage, shot his victim, Hamilton, twice in the head after he saw Hamilton flirting with his girlfriend. When Hamilton reached the hospital, his heart was still beating, but he had suffered irreversible brain damage and loss of brain function (as evidenced by EEG and other medical evidence). Hamilton’s family agreed to have his artificial ventilation turned off (it was keeping his heart beating) so his organs could be harvested for transplantation.
Burr is charged with first-degree murder in Hamilton’s death. His defense attorney argues that the doctors who disconnected Hamilton’s ventilator were the cause of his death — not Burr. Is the defense counsel correct — why or why not? What if Hamilton’s family refused treatment due to his religious convictions, and he subsequently died?
5. Consider the different standards of Mens Rea dealt with in the text and class. Answer Questions 1, 2, and 3 (and subparts) from p. 176-77 in the Dressler casebook. Explain the reasoning behind your answers. The Model Penal Code statute (MPC) is in the textbook.