Missing Needle Cap Protector

Prepare

For this assignment, you will analyze the same current health care problem or issue topic area you selected for the Week 4 assignment. If you have not already done so, you must use this module to select your health care-related issue or problem based on the presented topic areas. To explore the chosen topic, use the first four topics of the Socratic Problem-Solving ApproachLinks to an external site. for critical thinking that were introduced in Week 4.

  1. Start by defining the health care problem or issue based on the selected health care topic.
  2. Then provide details about the problems or issues that are part of the chosen topic, and identify causes for the problems or issues.
  3. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic you are discussing by using articles found in the Week 4 assignment or searching the Capella library using the applicable undergraduate library research guide.

Write Your Paper

  1. Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
    • Assess the credibility of information sources.
    • Assess the relevance of the information sources.
  2. Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
    • Describe the reasons that make the problem or issue important to you.
    • Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
  3. Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
    • Describe potential solutions.
    • Compare and contrast your opinion with other opinions you find in sources from the Capella library.
    • Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
  4. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
    • Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
    • Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented
    • Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:

  • Title page. (A separate page.)
  • Introduction. (A one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.)
  • Identify the elements of the problem or issue, or question.
  • Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue, or question.
  • Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
  • Choose a solution, response, or answer.
  • Implementation of the potential solution.
  • Conclusion. (One paragraph.)

Academic Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Length: Include at least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.
  • Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Writing: Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
  • Sources: Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.
  • References: Use at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. Visit the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. page if needed.

Example assignment: You may use the Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Example Assignment [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competencies Measured

  • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information demonstrating a spirit of inquiry that fosters flexibility and professional maturity.
    • Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
  • Competency 2: Apply scholarly information and clinical judgment identifying the impact of differing system structures, leadership, payment models, and workforce needs on health care outcomes.
    • Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
  • Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care embracing principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and antidiscrimination.
    • Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
  • Competency 4: Write in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards, while demonstrating professional and personal honesty and integrity.
    • Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
    • Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

View Rubric

     
Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Criteria Ratings Pts
Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

69 to >58.65 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Uses relevant scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue, including the reasons that the chosen information helps to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

58.65 to >48.3 pts

PROFICIENT

Uses scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

48.3 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

/ 69 pts
Analyze the problem or issue.

66 to >56.1 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Analyzes the problem or issue including definition, who is involved, and causes of the problem or issue.

 

56.1 to >46.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes the problem or issue.

 

46.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies a problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify a problem or issue.

 

/ 66 pts
Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.

60 to >51 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue, including potential consequences for ignoring the issue.

 

51 to >42 pts

PROFICIENT

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue.

 

42 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not describe a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

/ 60 pts
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

45 to >38.25 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Explains the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if potential solution was implemented and enriches the analysis with examples from the readings.

 

38.25 to >31.5 pts

PROFICIENT

Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

 

31.5 to >0 pts

BASIC

Mentions ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if the potential solution was implemented but does not explain them.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not mention ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.

 

/ 45 pts
Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Produces text free of grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Produces text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Produces text with some grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow at times.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Produces text with significant grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow.

 

/ 30 pts
Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style without errors and uses current reference sources.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Integrates into text mostly appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style, but there are lapses in style use.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

/ 30 pts
Total Points: 0

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Missing Needle Cap Protector

Prepare

For this assignment, you will analyze the same current health care problem or issue topic area you selected for the Week 4 assignment. If you have not already done so, you must use this module to select your health care-related issue or problem based on the presented topic areas. To explore the chosen topic, use the first four topics of the Socratic Problem-Solving ApproachLinks to an external site. for critical thinking that were introduced in Week 4.

  1. Start by defining the health care problem or issue based on the selected health care topic.
  2. Then provide details about the problems or issues that are part of the chosen topic, and identify causes for the problems or issues.
  3. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic you are discussing by using articles found in the Week 4 assignment or searching the Capella library using the applicable undergraduate library research guide.

Write Your Paper

  1. Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
    • Assess the credibility of information sources.
    • Assess the relevance of the information sources.
  2. Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
    • Describe the reasons that make the problem or issue important to you.
    • Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
  3. Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
    • Describe potential solutions.
    • Compare and contrast your opinion with other opinions you find in sources from the Capella library.
    • Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
  4. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
    • Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
    • Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented
    • Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:

  • Title page. (A separate page.)
  • Introduction. (A one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.)
  • Identify the elements of the problem or issue, or question.
  • Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue, or question.
  • Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
  • Choose a solution, response, or answer.
  • Implementation of the potential solution.
  • Conclusion. (One paragraph.)

Academic Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Length: Include at least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.
  • Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Writing: Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
  • Sources: Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.
  • References: Use at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. Visit the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. page if needed.

Example assignment: You may use the Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Example Assignment [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competencies Measured

  • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information demonstrating a spirit of inquiry that fosters flexibility and professional maturity.
    • Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
  • Competency 2: Apply scholarly information and clinical judgment identifying the impact of differing system structures, leadership, payment models, and workforce needs on health care outcomes.
    • Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
  • Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care embracing principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and antidiscrimination.
    • Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
  • Competency 4: Write in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards, while demonstrating professional and personal honesty and integrity.
    • Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
    • Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

View Rubric

     
Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Criteria Ratings Pts
Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

69 to >58.65 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Uses relevant scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue, including the reasons that the chosen information helps to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

58.65 to >48.3 pts

PROFICIENT

Uses scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

48.3 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

/ 69 pts
Analyze the problem or issue.

66 to >56.1 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Analyzes the problem or issue including definition, who is involved, and causes of the problem or issue.

 

56.1 to >46.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes the problem or issue.

 

46.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies a problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify a problem or issue.

 

/ 66 pts
Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.

60 to >51 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue, including potential consequences for ignoring the issue.

 

51 to >42 pts

PROFICIENT

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue.

 

42 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not describe a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

/ 60 pts
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

45 to >38.25 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Explains the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if potential solution was implemented and enriches the analysis with examples from the readings.

 

38.25 to >31.5 pts

PROFICIENT

Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

 

31.5 to >0 pts

BASIC

Mentions ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if the potential solution was implemented but does not explain them.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not mention ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.

 

/ 45 pts
Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Produces text free of grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Produces text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Produces text with some grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow at times.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Produces text with significant grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow.

 

/ 30 pts
Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style without errors and uses current reference sources.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Integrates into text mostly appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style, but there are lapses in style use.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

/ 30 pts
Total Points: 0

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Missing Needle Cap Protector

Prepare

For this assignment, you will analyze the same current health care problem or issue topic area you selected for the Week 4 assignment. If you have not already done so, you must use this module to select your health care-related issue or problem based on the presented topic areas. To explore the chosen topic, use the first four topics of the Socratic Problem-Solving ApproachLinks to an external site. for critical thinking that were introduced in Week 4.

  1. Start by defining the health care problem or issue based on the selected health care topic.
  2. Then provide details about the problems or issues that are part of the chosen topic, and identify causes for the problems or issues.
  3. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic you are discussing by using articles found in the Week 4 assignment or searching the Capella library using the applicable undergraduate library research guide.

Write Your Paper

  1. Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
    • Assess the credibility of information sources.
    • Assess the relevance of the information sources.
  2. Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
    • Describe the reasons that make the problem or issue important to you.
    • Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
  3. Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
    • Describe potential solutions.
    • Compare and contrast your opinion with other opinions you find in sources from the Capella library.
    • Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing.
  4. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
    • Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
    • Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented
    • Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:

  • Title page. (A separate page.)
  • Introduction. (A one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.)
  • Identify the elements of the problem or issue, or question.
  • Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue, or question.
  • Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
  • Choose a solution, response, or answer.
  • Implementation of the potential solution.
  • Conclusion. (One paragraph.)

Academic Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Length: Include at least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.
  • Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Writing: Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
  • Sources: Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.
  • References: Use at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. Visit the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. page if needed.

Example assignment: You may use the Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Example Assignment [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the rubric would look like.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competencies Measured

  • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information demonstrating a spirit of inquiry that fosters flexibility and professional maturity.
    • Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.
  • Competency 2: Apply scholarly information and clinical judgment identifying the impact of differing system structures, leadership, payment models, and workforce needs on health care outcomes.
    • Analyze the problem or issue.
    • Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
  • Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care embracing principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and antidiscrimination.
    • Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.
  • Competency 4: Write in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards, while demonstrating professional and personal honesty and integrity.
    • Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
    • Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

View Rubric

     
Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue
Criteria Ratings Pts
Use scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

69 to >58.65 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Uses relevant scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue, including the reasons that the chosen information helps to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

58.65 to >48.3 pts

PROFICIENT

Uses scholarly information to explain a health care problem or issue.

 

48.3 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify scholarly information that could explain a health care problem or issue.

 

/ 69 pts
Analyze the problem or issue.

66 to >56.1 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Analyzes the problem or issue including definition, who is involved, and causes of the problem or issue.

 

56.1 to >46.2 pts

PROFICIENT

Analyzes the problem or issue.

 

46.2 to >0 pts

BASIC

Identifies a problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not identify a problem or issue.

 

/ 66 pts
Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.

60 to >51 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue, including potential consequences for ignoring the issue.

 

51 to >42 pts

PROFICIENT

Discusses potential solutions for the problem or issue.

 

42 to >0 pts

BASIC

Describes a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not describe a potential solution for the problem or issue.

 

/ 60 pts
Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

45 to >38.25 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Explains the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if potential solution was implemented and enriches the analysis with examples from the readings.

 

38.25 to >31.5 pts

PROFICIENT

Explains the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented.

 

31.5 to >0 pts

BASIC

Mentions ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) that need to be considered if the potential solution was implemented but does not explain them.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not mention ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.

 

/ 45 pts
Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Produces text free of grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Produces text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Produces text with some grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow at times.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Produces text with significant grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow.

 

/ 30 pts
Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

30 to >25.5 pts

DISTINGUISHED

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style without errors and uses current reference sources.

 

25.5 to >21 pts

PROFICIENT

Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

21 to >0 pts

BASIC

Integrates into text mostly appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style, but there are lapses in style use.

 

0 pts

NON_PERFORMANCE

Does not integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

 

/ 30 pts
Total Points: 0

 

Posted in Uncategorized

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount