money point case

Reflect on the Money Point case study, where the Elizabeth River Project and collaborating organizations worked to remove creosote pollution from a heavily industrialized stretch of the Elizabeth River in Virginia.  Your initial post should be at least 300-500 words in length, should cite several specific details from the full revitalization plan and should include several of the following: 

• How likely were they to succeed with this restoration?
• How successful was this restoration, given the context, and the initial level of pollution?
• How pristine should we aim to restore urbanized rivers?  Is that realistic in this case?
• Is this an example of conservation or preservation?  How does this restoration effort work to promote sustainability in coastal Virginia?
• Why was this restoration successful/not successful?  What could be done to improve the project’s success?

AND at least one of the following: 

• Who are the stakeholders in this case?
• Why are the stakeholders engaged/not engaged with their local river?  What factors impact this?
• What could the Elizabeth River Project do to better engage with stakeholders for this project?