*******The dissertation needs to be ORIGINAL and UNIQUE***** The dissertation sh

*******The dissertation needs to be ORIGINAL and UNIQUE*****
The dissertation should outline the Qualities of a Leader in Cybersecurity. It needs to outline the answer to the following research question: “What Leadership Qualities are Required to be a Successful Leader within the Cybersecurity Industry.” Further, the dissertation needs to outline the PROBLEM which is in fact that cybersecurity is a relatively new industry and thus it, for the most part, does not have adequate leadership due to the fact that it is a new industry and generations of cybersecurity leaders have not existed previously; it also needs to be comprehensive and reference all reference materials uploaded onto “Additional Materials.”
The dissertation should have the following structure:
INTRODUCTION (three paragraphs: roughly 500 words)
-Context – provide brief background on the organization or situation
-Problem – briefly outline the problem that you are addressing
-Solution – foreshadow your approach; and solutions, conclusions or recommendations
ORGANIZATION AND PROBLEM: Background and Context (1000 words or so)
-Brief, problem relevant background on organization
-More thorough discussion of the problem: why is it important? —–Perhaps recognize relevant sub problems and interdependencies
*-Foreshadow how you will work through and organize the analysis (outside in, inside out, temporal or process structure)
ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM: (3000/3500 words or so)
-Systematically and carefully apply frameworks
-Provide narrative examples
-Discuss implementation related hurdles and opportunities
-Recognize limitations of analysis
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS (1000 words or so)
-Discuss your solutions, conclusions and recommendations
(Add something new here)
The assignment needs to contain ALL elements mentioned in the “Assignment Sources.pdf” file.
PLEASE AVOID the following: Poor writing and lack of attention to detail (for example, references); Haphazard structure; Lack of logical flow (from sentence to sentence,
paragraph to paragraph, and section to section); Too broad, unfocused and not well scoped