Learning Goal: I’m working on a writing multi-part question and need an explanat

Learning Goal: I’m working on a writing multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.word count at least 1100. Purpose This assignment is an opportunity for you to practice management by putting yourself in a decision maker’s position and allowing you to grapple with a real life scenarios facing actual employees in the workplace. This is also an opportunity to practice applying course concepts in order to manage your own professional career.Skills This assignment is an opportunity for you to practice the following skills that are essential to your success in any organizational setting:Analytical thinking skills: This assignment is an opportunity to practice consolidating data and information in order to make and justify specific recommendations.
Decision making skills: You will consider alternative courses of action, evaluate the alternatives, and select the most appropriate course of action. You will also justify why that course of action is the most appropriate.
Application of course concepts: This case study is an opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of theoretical concepts and frameworks covered in this course by applying these concepts to the information in this case.
Communication skills: This assignment is an opportunity to practice synthesizing and succinctly summarizing the most important parts of the case in order to make a persuasive argument that your recommendations are the most effective.
Task & GuidelinesYou will carefully examine the dilemma faced by three employees of McKinsey & Company related to choices they would have to make early in their careers, by reading the text case titled “McKinsey & Company: Early Career Choices (A).” The choices faced by the three early stage McKinsey & Company associates center around projects they should work on, places to live in, and people to work with. Arguably, the early career choices outlined in relation to the three McKinsey associates profiled in the case are representative of choices faced by early career professionals more broadly (of which you will soon be one!). Therefore, this case provides a roadmap to navigate such choices as you begin your professional career.To complete this case analysis, begin reading the case. As you read, pay close attention to information related to concepts we’ve covered in this course. For example, as you read the case text consider the following:Managerial functions, challenges, roles, and skills
Fundamentals of planning
Strategic-management process
Organizational structure and culture
Employee motivation
Effective teaming
Decision making
Leadership
Human resource management
Your task for this assignment is to create 2-page memo in which you formally write up your responses to three prompts:Prompt I: Put yourself in the shoes of the three McKinsey associates profiled in the case. What advice would you give them? Specifically answer the following:Should Bill move to Korea?
Which of the three projects should Tiffany pursue?
Should Alex continue to explore opportunities within McKinsey or should he go back to his engineering roots in Europe?
Prompt II: If you had to hypothesize, which of these three associates had the strongest chance of making partner at McKinsey?
Prompt III: As you think about the first few years of your career, are there tradeoffs involved in choosing projects, places, and people to work with? How would you use what you learned in this course to resolve these tradeoffs?
For each of the prompts prepare a minimum of one paragraph to support your recommendations citing evidence from the case and connecting your recommendations to course concepts.See attached file for example paper. Note, the example is of a 1-page memo. Your limit is 2 pages for this assignment.
Address your memo to Nicole Wilson, Senior Instructor I
Use 12 point font
1 inch margins
Single spaced
2 pages maximum
Case Analysis RubricCase Analysis RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendation25 ptsOutstandingDelivered actionable recommendations with a high likelihood of success based upon case material. Convinces audience of recommendations.20 ptsEffectivePresented specific, actionable recommendation. Convinces audience of recommendations, but leaves a few issues uncovered.15 ptsSomewhat EffectiveAdditional work is needed on providing detailed recommendation to audience.0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence/Research25 ptsOutstandingAll statements are supported with evidence. Thorough and proper citation.20 ptsEffectiveMost statements are supported with evidence. Thorough and proper citation.15 ptsSomewhat EffectiveSome statements are supported with evidence. Thorough and proper citation.0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSituation Analysis25 ptsOutstandingThorough analysis of resources, processes, and people Demonstrates firm understanding of course concepts.20 ptsEffectiveCovers most major resource, process, or people areas that are important. Could have additional connections to course concepts.15 ptsSomewhat EffectiveAdditional work is needed on providing detail about some processes, resources or people. Assertions and conclusions not always substantiated with connections to course concepts.0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation and Writing25 ptsOutstandingExceptional presentation and structure – strong transitions, focused message, active voice and high skim value. Error free.20 ptsEffectiveGreat presentation and structure – some strong transitions, somewhat focused message, minimal use of passive voice and high skim value. A few errors.15 ptsSomewhat EffectiveGood presentation and structure, but requires additional work in a number of areas — prioritize message, develop transitions, skim value and action-oriented voice.0 ptsNo Marks25 ptsTotal Points: 100Previous