1.  Do you agree with the writer that an international court is the only way “to

1.  Do you agree with the writer that an international court is the only way “to hold some key individuals to account” for their criminal wrongdoing?  Why or why not?
2.  Using the article, create a short timeline of events in international criminal law from 1945 to 2003.  You need not include every event mentioned in the article.  For you, what are the most interesting highlights?
3.  The author said that at Nuremberg the Germans argued “that the rules of war [in WWII] had become obsolete and that ‘total war’ was legally permissible.”  What did the Germans mean by “total war” in 1945, and what would total war look like in our world today? 
Please answer each questions in own thoughts , Also number each answer