Category: Law

if the marriage is disturbing the wife and husband want to divorce, what legal steps should be taken??

1. Martin v. Martin and choose two “Notes and Questions” problems immediately following the case to answer 2. Harms v. Sprague and choose two “Notes and Questions” problems immediately following the case to answer DOES NOT Need to be brief, each one about one page double spaces. Please make sure it is typed, original work, NO PLAGARISM. Please see the text attached!

reply posts should draw from your readings, research, data, and personal experiences, as well as have academic support and include personal insights on the subject. A response such as “I agree” or “good job” will not meet the assignment criteria. It is anticipated that a substantive response will entail a minimum of 8-10 well-structured sentences

See attached for assignment details Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide substantive replies to at least two (2) different individual initial posts. Compare and contrast your rankings to those of your peers. After reading their reasoning and explanations, and comparing them to yours, would you change your rankings in any way? Explain.

1. Discuss the specific limitations of Federal Court jurisdiction and state whether you think such limitations reflect the interest of the founding fathers to reserve most of the judicial authority to the states. 2. Provide insight into this statement: “The states are the best places to resolve most legal controversies, particularly those involving individual rights, because states are much closer to the people and are better agents to reflect the true opinion of the majority.” 3. Provide your opinion on the matter of whether the Constitution is a “living” document subject to flexible interpretation.

1. Reveal, for your colleagues, an example of how the legal system has impacted your life or regulated your behavior. 2. This can be something as simple as receiving a traffic ticket to something as complex as the resolution of a contract dispute or the dissolution of a marriage or the definition of private property rights. As stated above, don’t just describe the situation, but discuss the impact. 3. Discuss, on a broader scale, your understanding of how the judicial process has protected the vision of America held by the founding fathers. 4. This can be something as simple as allowing flag burning as a form of First Amendment protected free speech to something as complex as banking regulation which limits the ability of financial institutions to foreclose on delinquent mortgages. 5. Your discussion here should demonstrate an awareness of the involvement of the rule of law in our daily lives. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. Compare and contrast your situation and issues to theirs. Identify any differences and provide additional insights related to those differences.

review and quote from Chapter 3.1 in Film: From Watching to Seeing for clear explanation of genre and why genre theory is one useful approach to the study of film. Describe the common conventions (story, theme, mise-en-scène) of the genre you have selected. The Film will be Field of Dreams

1. Discuss the specific limitations of Federal Court jurisdiction and state whether you think such limitations reflect the interest of the founding fathers to reserve most of the judicial authority to the states. 2. Provide insight into this statement: “The states are the best places to resolve most legal controversies, particularly those involving individual rights, because states are much closer to the people and are better agents to reflect the true opinion of the majority.” 3. Provide your opinion on the matter of whether the Constitution is a “living” document subject to flexible interpretation.

1. Reveal, for your colleagues, an example of how the legal system has impacted your life or regulated your behavior. 2. This can be something as simple as receiving a traffic ticket to something as complex as the resolution of a contract dispute or the dissolution of a marriage or the definition of private property rights. As stated above, don’t just describe the situation, but discuss the impact. 3. Discuss, on a broader scale, your understanding of how the judicial process has protected the vision of America held by the founding fathers. 4. This can be something as simple as allowing flag burning as a form of First Amendment protected free speech to something as complex as banking regulation which limits the ability of financial institutions to foreclose on delinquent mortgages. 5. Your discussion here should demonstrate an awareness of the involvement of the rule of law in our daily lives. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. Compare and contrast your situation and issues to theirs. Identify any differences and provide additional insights related to those differences.

WEEK 5 JUDICIAL LAWMAKING I: LAW BUILT ON PRECEDENTS
Bryan Smith. (2014). “The Trouble with Robbins,” Chicago Magazine.
https://www.chicagomag.com/chicago-magazine/december-2014/the-trouble-with-robbins/
The Lone Liberal Republican, A Politically Moderate Guide to Police Reform, including Things You Can Do to Help, Reform #4: Give Police Executives More Power to Terminate Abusive Officers.
1. What are the main points of the reading?
2. What do you like and dislike about the reading?