Analytical memos: you will be expected to read the assigned readings and write a

Analytical memos: you will be expected to read the assigned readings and write an analytical memo / reflection / literature review 500 – 800 words long. The purpose is not to summarize the readings. A useful analytical memo will identify key issues that are important for understanding the topic. interesting or innovative aspects; things that catch your attention; issues you find problematic and worthy of critical assessment – in one or more of the assigned texts.
Formation of the EU as a political entity Bartolini, S. (2006): “A Comparative Political Approach to the EU Formation.” Working Paper 04-2006, Oslo: ARENA
https://ceses.cuni.cz/CESES-141-version1-2_1__BARTOLINI_Europeanization_by_Rokkan.pdf
Bickerton, C. (2012): European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 74 – 150

Y‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍our global expansion project is expanding, and you are to d

Y‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍our global expansion project is expanding, and you are to develop a global franchise team and establish a presence in the countries. You invite all of the players to the headquarters in the United States for a big meeting to explain the project and get to know one another. You are concerned with effective communication and need to address the following issues: What are the implications of the cultural varia‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍bles for your communication with the team representative from each country in the face-to-face meeting? What are examples of barriers and biases in cross-cultural business communications that may impact the effectiveness of communication? What are some of the issues you should be concerned about regarding verbal and nonverbal communication for this group to avoid misinterpretations and barriers to communication‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍?

Discuss your selected Key ‘Entering Global Markets and Managing Global Operation

Discuss your selected Key ‘Entering Global Markets and Managing Global Operations’ term. You should explain why you are interested in the term, an explanation of the term, a summary of the germane current literature, and specifically how this relates to Entering Global Markets and Managing Global Operations.
Key Term: Fixed Assets
**Follow attached instructions carefully.
**Only scholarly peer reviewed sources for references.

The Following prompt is adapted from International Business Law and Its Environm

The Following prompt is adapted from International Business Law and Its Environment, Eighth Edition:
Read “Ethical Considerations” on page 363 of your text. Next, write an essay where you address the situation described there.
Your response may, but need not, draw upon resources outside this course, but it definitely should reflect the concerns you addressed during the course and the information you gained from the course materials. The primary consideration in grading this assignment is not whether you are “right” or”wrong” (although any responses that show that the material presented during this course was not learned or applied correctly will count against you); the primary focus of the assignment, and the controlling element in your grade, will be your ability to present a well-reasoned position, in which you discuss some (or many) of the prevailing concerns and show an ability to incorporate the possible responses to those concerns which were presented in the book, applying these responses to the problem you are presented with.
To restate: you will be graded on two criteria: first, that you have absorbed and can articulate the issues raised by the material in this course and the possible responses to those issues; second, that you can write on a level

Students will write a final research paper, relating arguments from the theoret

Students will write a final research paper, relating arguments from the theoretical readings in class with a specific empirical international legal document (or series of related documents). This could include a specific treaty, customary law, or international law case (within either an international or regional court, or a domestic court applying international law).
The topic I chose are the Compliance theories and the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.
Here is my paper introduction/ outline:
The flow of immigrants coming to the southern border of the United States has caused a problem of mass immigration. Many immigrants are coming to the United States fleeing the delinquency and crime of their countries. Others come with the prosperity of having a better life. Many request asylum because if they go back to their countries they would get kill. However, recently there has been an increasing number of countries who are abandoning multilateralism treaties and violating those international treaties and conventions signed and ratified in the past. The purpose of this paper is to relate the arguments from the compliance theories, specifically the rationalist and constructivist school views to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951. First, I will talk about the compliance theories and discuss specifically the rationalist and constructivist school views. Then, I will explain what is an international treaty and the conflict it arises when States don’t comply with a treaty. Also, I will elaborate on the reason why States comply with a treaty. Third, I will examine the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and focus on some of their articles. Finally, at the end of this paper, I will discuss how the United States violates the CRSR and connect it to the theories. The United States violates is doing little progress to comply with the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951.

1. The thesis of your paper should be the answer to the question: “What explains

1. The thesis of your paper should be the answer to the question: “What explains the outcome in this case?”
2. give a brief intro, then reasons why Brazil did what it did, impact to the US govt
3. Provide data from the reading to back up your points.
4. what did both of the country did to resolve the problem.
5. conclusions

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ritique a foreign policy strategy, past or present, and mak

C‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ritique a foreign policy strategy, past or present, and make an argument for what should be done differently or why that policy was effective. You will be required to right a 6-8 (more is fine) page paper making an argument of some kind. Make sure this is an argument, not simply z paper informing me of something that happened or is happening. This is an opinion of yours that you are backing up with research. My expectations for the paper structure are below: Intro – not quite 1 page, one or two paragraphs You can do this in one giant paragraph, but two may be better. Your first paragraph should like a lot like it did in the first paper we did. Intro sentence, introduce your topic, provide your thesis (paper topic, the main point you are arguing), and maybe your two points and counterpoints. In a second paragraph, I would provide the big picture background info of what you are talking about. If we are talking about the Suez Crisis, for example, this would be your opportunity to generally tell me the story of the Crisis. Specific details and statistics should be saved, but it is a good time to give me the narrative of what is going on. With the Suez Crisis, I would provide the broad events that Egypt was nationalizing the canal and creating a conflict with European and Israeli powers, and that the US came to its aid. However, I would more specific information, for use in the rest of my paper. Argument points 1 & 2: at least 1, closer to 2 pages each These are the two reasons that hold up your main argument. These sections need to do three things; tell me what your point is, tell me how it’s related to your primary topic, and tell me why I should care. If I am writing a paper about stopping deforestation, one point might be “it affects climate change.” For that section of the paper, then, I would first need to articulate the point and make it relevant to my topic (trees suck out carbon and produce oxygen). This can be done with 2-3 sentences. I should then spend the next pages convincing my reader that climate change (and thus deforestation) is important. I might share temperature change statistics, point to changes in the artic circle, and/or how changing temperatures affects other species. Paint a picture with your research, don’t just tell me it’s “bad” or “makes sense.” Don’t ask your reader to trust your credibility, lean on your source‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s and let them do the work. Think like a lawyer; what’s more convincing, the detectives “hunch,” or the pool of the killer’s blood found at the crime scene? It’s typically better to lead with your better of your two points. Counter Argument – at least 1, closer to 2 pages Unlike your first paper, on this one I would your third point to be addressing a counterpoint to your argument. In other words, would is a common point of those who disagree with you? Then, tell me why this is incorrect, irrelevant, or overstated. If you want to pick on a few of the points the “other side” makes, that would be fine. Just be sure you are countering their evidence with better evidence. One sneaky trick I have used is to get really deep in there and learn about the sources of the “other side.” Is there a conflict of interest there you can exploit? One example I used as an undergrad of this was to address someone’s critique that John Boehner couldn’t relate to poor people and thus he would never be someone his conservative policies affected adversely. While this is true of many politicians, the writer failed to understand Boehner was 1 of like, 12 kids in a lower-income household growing up and worked his way through college back when that was still possible. It basically allowed me to discredit the author because the rest of their piece was based on this presumption. Note that because an org is conservative and produces research beneficial to conservatives, (or liberal, or libertarian, or any political group producing self-serving research) that is not enough to throw out the argument for “bias.” Conclusion: Not quite a page Put a bow on your paper. Remind your reader of the main points you made. I recommend starting with some “hey, this is the end of the paper” sentence, then following with your next three sentences being summaries of the three points you made. After that, leave the reader with some closing remarks. Think of this as your opportunity to make one last impression, and dictate what your reader should leave the paper thinking. Requirements and Grading criteria: 6-8 Pages, more is completely fine 10 sources at the bare minimum, but I would expect to be closer to 15+ if you are being thorough Make sure you are arguing a point, not just informing me of something Citations are done correctly Paper is clearly organized well Paper is well a‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍rticulated; I can understand what you are saying easily