Your job is to look at the opposing arguments (from ONLY the THREE PDF documents

Your job is to look at the opposing arguments (from ONLY the THREE PDF documents PROVIDED) and develop and discuss a personal opinion within a structured report.
YOU MUST
1. Introduce the problem
2. Present data – the opposing models
3. Discuss / critically evaluate the models and decide which YOU think best fits the available data. Maybe use analogues to help.
4. Discuss implications of your findings for petroleum and/ or subsurface systems
5. Conclude
Your way into the animosity of this argument is within this reply, and further reply: Martinsen & Collinson, 2002, The Western Irish Namurian Basin reassessed – a discussion:
(PDF Provided)
Further explored in Wignall & Best’s 2016 book: Chapter 3:
(PDF Provided)
Wildcard: Higgs (2006) thinks it’s a lake: (PDF Provided)
The ONLY resources YOU can USE is the PDF PROVIDED (3 PDF Provided).
Lastly, setting up text & numbered header hierarchy; auto figure numbering/ captioning/ cross-referencing, etc. (VERY IMPORTANT).
The PPTX “Report writing for science” explains how the report should be written, including Applying an ordered hierarchy to your text and others.
IF you have any questions, please let me know.