**** use source provided, no other source needed Reflecting on David Griggs 2013

**** use source provided, no other source needed
Reflecting on David Griggs 2013( attached document ) and the Planetary
Boundaries concept described by the Stockholm Resilience Centre 2021( see link below),
describe how Patagonia is using the sustainable development goals as design
constraints for their products and services. Considering Kurucz et al. (2013)
Chapter 3 ( see link to textbook), which of their efforts do you think represent the most efficient business
practices for sustainability? Why? What are they doing that is promoting
greater effectiveness toward sustainability? Why? Would you
describe any of their initiatives as potentially transformational?
Why? You may find Brackley & Lee (2017) in the supplementary materials
particularly relevant to this part of the dialogue.
Provide 4 questions to begin dialogues
https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Reconstructing_Value/UP6Mcp0wlRoC?hl=en&gbpv=1
( Kurucz et al. (2013) Chapter 3)

(How to make sustainable clothing )
https://apparelcoalition.org/the-sac/
(sustainable apparel coalition)
https://www.patagonia.com/sustainable-apparel-coalition.html
( Patagonia sustainable apparel coalition)
https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/sustainability/how-patagonia-transformed-the-circular-economy
(Patagonia’s Circular Economy Strategy)
https://www.patagonia.com/our-footprint/
(footprint)
https://wornwear.patagonia.com/
( Patagonia worn and wear program )
https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html
( Stockholm University )