P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease refer to the file to read the scenario, then follow t

P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍lease refer to the file to read the scenario, then follow the instructions below: Your writing response (25000 words) should address these areas 1. First, identify three problems in the situation. Using literature, form a position around these three problems and explain why a leader must address these issues (400-500 words). [Commented: Section 1 of your writing. What are the three problems that you identified from the situation? Your position about these problems needs to be informed by the current literature where different problems with team work have been discussed. You need to discuss the three problems you identified and explain why a leader must deal with these problems in section 1., please refer to the file] 2. Now that you have established three problems, you need to consider how to dissolve the issues. Select three journal articles from 2010 onwards that report empirical research about staff management and the three identified presenting problems in the scenario. These articles should NOT be subject readings. [Commented: Select three articles that conform to those criteria 1) publish after 2010 2) empirical studies about staff management. 3) These articles presented the problems in the scenario. 4) NOT be subject readings, please refer to the file] 3. For each article, develop a heuristic statement that expresses a principle you have distilled from the research article that will support your response to the three problems. Accompany each heuristic statement with an explanation of no more than 600 words, that includes: • detail about the article to explain how your principle relates to the research article (400 words) • what insights from the article informs o‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍r modifies your personal leadership theory on decisional capital and staff management (200 words). [Commented: For each article, you need to address those yellow bits, please refer to the file] More explanation: OBSERVATIONS: • Josh and Mohammed have negative attitudes (complain to colleagues outside the team about work load) causing team conflict. • Larissa doesn’t engage with the team; over the negativity; not motivated or interested in making changes or engaging in PL&D • Sahar is passionate and motivated to share new ideas and resources but has expressed privately she doesn’t enjoy being a part of the team. • Vihaan adopts a neutral position about the changes you are trying to make. • Divide between team members with negative comments being made by all team members to other colleagues. Some PROBLEMS: • Leadership-how does the leader manage staff performance; manage recruitment? • Learning organisation- has this school the capacity to change and adapt to new environments and circumstances? • Conflict- how is the conflict between staff being managed by the leader? • Conditions- does the environment enable collaboration; are the staff open to giving and seeking feedback; are staff involved in professional conversations? • Team development- are expectations and responsibilities clear? • Team trust- is there a culture of trust, respect and a nurturing atmosphere? Are relationships positive? • Staff motivation- how does the leader motivate the staff? • Engagement of members- PL&D; are staff challenged and also supported; are adult learning principles acknowledged and implemented? • Professional learning & development- how ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍is it being lead and is it effective?

Posted in Uncategorized

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount