Suggested Title: Criteria for the nomination of academics for leadership positio

Suggested Title:
Criteria for the nomination of academics for leadership positions in institutions of higher education in the new era
Draft, data, results, and some sources are all included.
The article should be written as an original research not as a review or viewpoint article. The methodology should be very clear and in detail.
The article will be submitted to the following journal, so make sure its instructions:
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=heds20

Review of the Professional and Academic Literature Paper Requirements: • 10 com

Review of the Professional and Academic Literature
Paper Requirements:
• 10 complete pages (not counting the reference page)
• APA format (New 7th edition)
• Include headings and subheadings
• NO ABSTRACT NEEDED
• Reference page
• 15 scholarly sources published in the last 5 years (2016-2021).
• All scholarly source articles must include doi: hyperlink
Research Topic: The Impact of Leadership Styles on Employee Engagement in Virtual Work Environments: A Qualitative Analysis
The goal of the literature review is to show the connection between the existing body of knowledge and how transformational and/or transactional leadership style influences virtual employee engagement resulting in different levels of ability for an organization to foster employee satisfaction, commitment, and productivity.
• Write a narrative Literature Review
• The literature review should provide a ‘360-degree’ view of the literature related to the problem illustrating all sides of the discussion, not just perspectives
• Include both supporting and contradictory scholarly reference material.
• Write/Include an introductory paragraph of 250 – words that provides an overview or ‘roadmap’ of the main elements of the literature review.
• Write/Include a detailed discussion presenting all viewpoints, not just those that support the research topic.

This is a paper that will use Black Feminist Thought and other black epistemolog

This is a paper that will use Black Feminist Thought and other black epistemologies to explain misogynoir from White women and interlocking systems of oppression.
~Introduction
Explain the crux of Black Feminist Thought (BFT) and it’s necessity.
The body of the paper must answer three questions:
1. Does the White hegemonic knowledge validation process subjugate Black women intellectuals?
2. Can Black women tell their lived from an intellectual lens? (use divergent Black women epistemologies to answer)
3. Can dominant culture women scholars dictate Black women experiences?
Conclusion
~Say what was said
~Anything that could use some more research
~Anything Black women can do from a disadvantage

*******The dissertation needs to be ORIGINAL and UNIQUE***** The dissertation sh

*******The dissertation needs to be ORIGINAL and UNIQUE*****
The dissertation should outline the Qualities of a Leader in Cybersecurity. It needs to outline the answer to the following research question: “What Leadership Qualities are Required to be a Successful Leader within the Cybersecurity Industry.” Further, the dissertation needs to outline the PROBLEM which is in fact that cybersecurity is a relatively new industry and thus it, for the most part, does not have adequate leadership due to the fact that it is a new industry and generations of cybersecurity leaders have not existed previously; it also needs to be comprehensive and reference all reference materials uploaded onto “Additional Materials.”
The dissertation should have the following structure:
INTRODUCTION (three paragraphs: roughly 500 words)
-Context – provide brief background on the organization or situation
-Problem – briefly outline the problem that you are addressing
-Solution – foreshadow your approach; and solutions, conclusions or recommendations
ORGANIZATION AND PROBLEM: Background and Context (1000 words or so)
-Brief, problem relevant background on organization
-More thorough discussion of the problem: why is it important? —–Perhaps recognize relevant sub problems and interdependencies
*-Foreshadow how you will work through and organize the analysis (outside in, inside out, temporal or process structure)
ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM: (3000/3500 words or so)
-Systematically and carefully apply frameworks
-Provide narrative examples
-Discuss implementation related hurdles and opportunities
-Recognize limitations of analysis
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS (1000 words or so)
-Discuss your solutions, conclusions and recommendations
(Add something new here)
The assignment needs to contain ALL elements mentioned in the “Assignment Sources.pdf” file.
PLEASE AVOID the following: Poor writing and lack of attention to detail (for example, references); Haphazard structure; Lack of logical flow (from sentence to sentence,
paragraph to paragraph, and section to section); Too broad, unfocused and not well scoped

You have been interviewing for an executive leadership position within your sect

You have been interviewing for an executive leadership position within your sector specialty (corporate, government, or nonprofit). The search committee has notified you that three finalists will go to the next round of the interview process.
Now that you have passed all the interview phases, you must submit a business letter outlining your leadership philosophy as it relates to this position.
Be cognizant of your own leadership philosophy criteria, with an option to include the following in your letter:
-Leadership philosophy implementation proposal the first year.
-Direction of sector for future initiatives.
-Sustainability for strengths in organization culture.
Support your assignment with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these scholarly resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.
Length: 4-5 pages, not including title and reference pages
Your letter should demonstrate thoughtful synthesis of the concepts presented in this course by providing new insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

The main idea is “A *Public Agency* has a problem with its leadership structure

The main idea is “A *Public Agency* has a problem with its leadership structure and style in the human resources department.” My problem is I do not have any specific organization of who the “public agency” in this project. I will need your assistance to choose one for this project. You may even use your previous organization. I provided outline, idea, strategies and excerpt of the final project accumulated during the course. As you can see, I am all over the places … ha ha ha .. PLEASE HELP ME! Additionally, you are welcome to add any reference on top of the required reading materials.

F520-C: Journal 2 (DFM) F520C – Journal Reflection Assignment: SGM/CSM Role in S

F520-C: Journal 2 (DFM)
F520C – Journal Reflection Assignment: SGM/CSM Role in Sustainment
Purpose: The purpose of the journal reflection assignment is for the learner to reflect on their learning regarding the topic below.
Topic of Journaling: Write a 275 substantive journal entry in APA 7 format describing the Sergeant Major or Command Sergeant Major role in sustainment to include your thoughts on what you think is important for a SGM/CSM to know in order to assist the commander in ensuring the organization has what it need to operate properly. Be sure to reference appropriate doctrine that supports your analysis. Analyze the concepts and theories you read about in F201, F202, F203, and F204( all of these resources have been uploaded into the files section); utilizing key language and terms from these concepts and theories, post a substantial journal entry on the topic with at least two cited sources.
I have also attached a copy of my classmates jouurnal from this class and topic .

Please read the assignment guide line carefully and follow the requirement and p

Please read the assignment guide line carefully and follow the requirement and pay attention to the marking criteria in “Marking Rubric” in page # 4 and the Assessment criteria in page #2
I have attached the study material for all 5 days of the course module so you can understand the nature of the content I have studied.
The references should be appropriate academic references.
Leave the first page empty for cover page and include table of content.

****PLEASE USE TEMPLATE ATTACHED IN FILES FOR TGHIS ASSIGNMENT**** ****PLEASE RE

****PLEASE USE TEMPLATE ATTACHED IN FILES FOR TGHIS ASSIGNMENT****
****PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS*****
****ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE 3 PAGES OF WRITING AND THE REFERENCE PAGE****
**EACH TOPIC IN CAPS AND THE SUB TOPIC IS NUMBERED**
****I HAVE ALSO ATTACHED A COPY OF LAST WEEK’S ASSIGNMENT IN THE FILE****
To complete Part 2 of the Assignment, you will assume the role of a manager in the following scenario:
Your peer mentoring group for managers held its first meeting last week, during which you and other managers shared your thoughts on authenticity, equity, inclusivity, and how your values and beliefs have been shaped throughout your life.
At the end of the meeting, your master mentor explained that each of you will now use these thoughts and reflections to 1) develop your personal code of ethics and 2) use your skills and abilities to influence positive social change.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Reflect on the definitions you described last week, as well as the values and beliefs you identified. Consider how these ideas might combine to form your personal code of ethics as a manager.
Additionally, consider how you might use this personal code of ethics, as well as other management and leadership skills (e.g., authentic leadership, emotional intelligence) to be an effective agent for positive social change.
Locate at least two examples of personal codes of ethics (or codes of conduct) online.
ANALYZING OTHERS’ PERSONAL CODE OF ETHICS
Analyze the personal codes of ethics of other individuals. Address the following:
1. Select two examples of personal codes of ethics (or codes of conduct) that you located online and attach them as appendices to your paper.
2. For each example, identify at least two specific aspects that resonate with you and/or that you would find helpful in guiding behavior as a manager. Additionally, for each example, provide at least one specific area that you believe could be improved.
CREATING YOUR PERSONAL CODE OF ETHICS
Create your personal code of ethics. Address the following:
1. Identify 3–5 core beliefs, values, or principles that will guide your behavior and decision making as a manager.
2. Propose 2–3 specific behaviors for each belief, value, or principle to show how they are demonstrated in action. (Note: Behaviors are specific actions that are observable by others.) Begin each proposed behavior with the phrase “I will…”
3. Reflecting on your past experiences when you have had to make ethical choices, how will having a clearly defined personal code of ethics help you clarify your choices and make your decisions in the future?
YOU AS A CHANGE AGENT
1.Propose how you will use your code of ethics to be an even more effective agent for positive social change. Be sure to include specific examples and details to support your assertion.
2. Describe how using your emotional intelligence, as well as other management and leadership skills, can help you be more effective as a change agent. Be sure to include specific examples and details to support your assertion.

Consider where you would stand on the following scenario: A company has develope

Consider where you would stand on the following scenario:
A company has developed a new product for which there is a great demand. The consensus of the leadership team is that the company should capitalize on this opportunity and hike up the price to generate a 300% return on each sale. They feel that, as long as the marketplace is willing to pay for it, then there is no problem, especially since this would help solve recent discussions of layoffs due to declining sales. Only one person in the leadership team voices disapproval of this approach, saying that this is a greedy action that would rip off customers and go against the company’s values. The person feels that—despite what it would mean for the business—the product should be priced to generate a 40% return, which is an average return for the company’s products.
In this Discussion, you will examine a tough decision you have had to make in the past. You will reflect on the factors you used to make that decision and determine whether you would make the same choice if faced with the same set of circumstances again.
To prepare for this Discussion:
1. Identify a time you had to make a tough decision related to work. This should be a time when the right course of action was not immediately apparent or clear-cut. There may have been differing points of view, each with some validity, or perhaps there were some special circumstances in the situation that made the correct and ethical choice less obvious.
2. Consider the values, guidelines, and rules that you used to make that decision.
ost a synthesis of a difficult work-related decision you had to make, including how you might approach the situation in the future. Specifically:
1. Describe the circumstances surrounding the difficult work-related decision you had to make. In your description, include details about the options you were weighing, why the decision was difficult, et cetera.
2. Explain the guidelines, rules, and values you used to make the decision.
3. Using the Learning Resources for support, explain how you would approach the situation if it happened again. Would you handle it differently or take a similar action, and why?