Paper is based on Environmental Law. Research Questions: 1.Critically analyze

Paper is based on Environmental Law.
Research Questions:
1.Critically analyze current legislation implemented on the use of mercury in mining in Guyana.
2.What measures should the Ministry of Natural Resources/ Guyana Geology and Mines Commission adapt to ensure enforcement of policies and laws with respect to the use of mercury in mining?
3.What strategies can the government implement to ensure the environment is free from mercury?
4.What role should the miners play in ensuring the environment is mercury free?
No plagiarism.
Research paper Must have introduction, body and conclusion.
Must not exceed 3,000 words (introduction, conclusion and reference pages excluded)
All sources must be cited.
High quality paper .
Must have extensive knowledge on mercury use in mining
Please ensure you understand the instructions before bidding.

Paper is based on Environmental Law. Research Questions: 1.Critically analyze cu

Paper is based on Environmental Law.
Research Questions:
1.Critically analyze current legislation implemented on the use of mercury in mining in Guyana.
2.What measures should the Ministry of Natural Resources/ Guyana Geology and Mines Commission adapt to ensure enforcement of policies and laws with respect to the use of mercury in mining?
3.What strategies can the government implement to ensure the environment is free from
mercury?
4.What role should the miners play in ensuring the environment is mercury free?
No plagiarism.
Research paper
Must have introduction, body and conclusion.
Must not exceed 3,000 words (introduction, conclusion and reference pages excluded)
All sources must be cited
High quality paper
Must have extensive knowledge on mercury use in mining
Please ensure you understand the instructions before bidding.

Why is the Most-Favored-Nation-Treatment Principle important to ensure the prope

Why is the Most-Favored-Nation-Treatment Principle important to ensure the proper functioning of the international trade system? In your answer, consider the relations between the Most-Favored-Nation-Treatment Principle and the National Treatment Principle.
*** Must incorporate Bible into discussion.***

You are the coordinator of a human rights team on a fact-finding mission to a co

You are the coordinator of a human rights team on a fact-finding mission to a country of your choice that has been alleged by the United Nations Human Rights Commission to have violated human rights of persons in an internal conflict. Draft fact-finding procedures to guide your team in the fact-finding mission and consider the following question:
By what standards may human rights be measured?

Qatar Environmental Policy and Legislation Flow hierarchy of How the decision ma

Qatar Environmental Policy and Legislation
Flow hierarchy of How the decision making process is done in Qatar “Environmental policy”
Talk about 1- Qatar policy  2-Decision making 3-National development strategies in Qatar 4- Qatar regulatory framework 5- Governance 6- Action plans and programs and cycles
And how they all involve in the decision making process
What international treaties Qatar has ratified and how they make local legislations and how they implement it and so on
Who implement: is the government
Who decide the policy in the state: is Aldiwan and alshora council

title of the paper is “The Regulation of Social Media Influencers under the grou

title of the paper is “The Regulation of Social Media Influencers under the grounds of international media freedom”
The topic of the essay must adopt an international or
comparative law perspective, and fit within media
freedom.
some suggested references:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3457197
Eleni , ‘Censorship’ in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of
Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP 2018) available at
http://oxcon.ouplaw.com (provided in PDF)
Report of the Special Rapporteur to the Human Rights Council on the
protection of journalists and media freedom, A/HRC/20/17 (2012) available
at
https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/Annual.aspx
US : Schenck v US  (1919) .
Case and summary available at
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/249/47/
– US: Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/343/495/ and comment 
available at https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/92/burstyn-v-
wilson 
– ECtHR : Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway (1999)
Comment available at
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/laws/ecthr-bladet-tromso-
and-stensaas-v-norway-gc-app-no-2198093-1999/
– ECtHR: Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey (2013) available at HUDOC,
and case summary available at
https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/ahmed-yildirim-v-
turkey/
– ECtHR Mariya Alekhina and Others v. Russia available at
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184666 and case summary available at
https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/09/11/pussy-riot-the-right-to-
protest-and-to-criticise-the-president-and-the-patriarch-mariya-alekhina-
and-others-v-russia/