define what is a failed state from a general perspective. What causes a state to fail, what are the factors – whether internal or external – that play a role in shaping the path of a state’s fragility and when is it considered as a fully failed state. Yemen will be the case used to reflect the definition of a failed or failing state by briefly providing historical context before describing the current situation. The fact it is the only failed state on the Arabian Peninsula and why is that the case. Also, Yemen has been rising in the Fragile State Index each year due to the uprising tensions that have happened since 2011. The role of Al-Qaeda, the former president Ali Abdullah Saleh and the Arab spring in addition to a brief to what impact has the Arab spring had on the other countries in comparison to Yemen. It also includes an examination of whether the war happening in Yemen up to now has an effect on its fragility as well as the political division of the territory. The consequences it has on its population, territory, domestic and international affairs, economy, and the Houthi’s ruling implications on the governing system of the country. Finally, the reason why it takes number 1 in the FSI for 2021. To sum up, a conclusion for what will be mentioned in the paper shortly.
master level Word limit: 2000 words There should be at list 20 references list with page numbers. Choose ONE of the following questions on critical IR theories. 1. Critically discuss the argument that capitalism, not anarchy,is the defining feature of the international system. 2. To what extent are Marxism and Neo-Marxism relevant to the study of International Relations? 3. What do post-modern perspectives add to IR? 4. What does a postcolonial analysis add to our understanding of international relations?
The requirement is to write a thesis/dissertation about “How the Abraham Accords Could Possibly Impact the Middle East in the Near Future”.
I have attached the research proposal (which custom writings wrote). the idea is to write the thesis/dissertation based on the research proposal. For this reason, I will have to request for the same writer to accommodate the requirement.
I have attached guidelines to follow when writing the thesis. these guidelines need to be thoroughly reviewed in extreme detail. Kindly use all the existing sources on the research proposal, and feel free to add more if needed.
In the attachment which is the syllabus on page 10 you will have all the instructions i will also attach my previous papers because this paper is based on the previous one’s also the sources will be attached with the previous assignment please follow the instructions on page 10 in the syllabus thank you.
Please make sure to read the question very carefully and give enough and fully answer to the first part of the question (On what grounds has it been argued that the regime of the Antarctic Treaty System should be reformed or replaced? ) and also to answer the second part of the question ( Should it be? ) with explaining why it should be reformed or replaced . Many thanks
This assignment is a take-home essay assignment of 2 questions, 3 pages each, to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. The exclusive use of required texts and readings from this course is mandatory.
Please follow all directions below.
Question 1: In what ways has the international community’s concern with human rights evolved since 1945? How has this led to the idea of “transnational justice”?
Question 2: In your view, are economic, political, social, or cultural rights more critical for the pursuit of transnational justice?
Both answers should rely only on the course materials for substantiation of arguments. Please do not go to the internet to “search” for answers, but create your own argumentation and support it with readings and materials from the class. The midterm is an assessment of what you have learned in the class – not how well you can research. Your research project will provide that opportunity.
Please present your work as a Word document, remembering to double-space and put your name and a title on the paper.
Important: Please present only one Word document with this assignment. Reproduce each question at the beginning of your essay so that it is obvious which question you are answering. Make sure to include a thesis statement in the first paragraph that addresses the question thoroughly. Papers presented with no indication of the questions’ being answered will be returned.
General Instructions for Assignments
All assignments should be written in Word and uploaded as attachments within the Assignments section of the classroom. Use 12 pt. font and double-space. Be sure to put your name and class information on the document and put your name on the file. Insert page numbers. The citation style is Chicago 16th Author-Date. In-text citations to the readings should be included (as applicable). A reference list should be included at the end of your document.
ALL SOURCES ARE ATTACHED
look first at the Final Assignment pdf to understand the assignment, then you can the short version I wrote to understand the direction I want to go with. simply put, I agree with the author only within the variables she presented in her study. you find the required reading attached here. feel free to use other English academic sources
Research Question: Which international theory best describes the conflict over Tigris and Euphrates rivers in the Middle East?
1. Realism through power and geopolitics
2. Liberalism through complex bargaining
Structure of the thesis:
1. Introduction (around 500 words)
2. Literature review of about 1500 words
3. Research question and hypothesis
4. Description of case studies (of other shared water conflicts) – at least three cases (around 1500 words, 500 for each case study)
5. Analysis and findings (around 1000 words)
6. Conclusion (around 500 words)
For this assignment, you will read the book To End a War by Richard Holbrooke. You will pick a situation Holbrooke had to face, from his book. You will then write a 3-page analysis with clear and concise points on what happened and what you would have done the same or differently had you been in Holbrooke’s place. In your analysis, include what happened and why, followed by what you would have done and why. Make sure to have a solid and logically flowing arguments in your analysis. If you would not have done anything differently, include arguments for why Holbrooke’s strategy was the best answer to that situation. Remember, it is not enough to state what was done or would have been done. Rational, logically flowing arguments and descriptions are necessary. ? Length of assignment: 3 full pages ? Format of assignment: Turabian ? Number of citations: minimum of 3 citations ? Acceptable sources: the Holbrooke book, scholarly sources. Make sure to check the grading rubric for details on the grading process. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Essay 2 (Second half of the course)
1. Which theory from the second half of the course (feminism, Marxism, post-structuralism or post-colonialism) grasps contemporary global politics best and why? (choose only 1)
2. Outline and assess the significance of Cox’s (1981) claim that “theory is always for someone and some purpose”.
3. Why is a feminist approach important to the study of international politics?
4. How has Post-structuralism troubled IR theory?
5. What is eurocentrism and why does it matter in IR theory?
[They didn’t give a limit to sources used but dont get excessive try to limit the amount of sources since its 8 pages]