Write an essay that will not exceed 2,500 words. The essay will bear on Otherness in Early Modern Literature (from 1470 to 1625). You will have to define “Otherness” as well as work on a thesis of your own making. The thesis will be explored through the reading of three plays (Richard III, King Lear and Hamlet all by Shakespeare). This will be an essay on Otherness in Early Modern Literature, not an essay on the three plays, therefore, the three plays will serve as source providers for the writing of the essay. The essay will have to be in Word Format.
i would like to write on propaganda in Hollywood. topic to be discussed with writer. i have attached texts to be used for this essay. it will be submitted via turn it in. blockbuster as propaganda: you must remember this:the case of Hal Wallis’ casanblanca in welky,D, Mintzs, &Roberts, RW(2016) hollywoods America: understanding history through film , John Wiley & sons . incorporated, Hoboken, Nj. (ch11, p156-65)
I need an essay on the text Mrs. Fox by Sarah Hall that argues the posthumanism aspect in this text. (I have the text so I can send it if there is something not clear that we need to discuss).
The essay asks you to analyze two literary excerpts (that I have as PDFs). No additional research is required. It should analyze what moral philosophies each author takes when describing a war crime. Do they assign blame, do they judge, do they contextualize or rationalize or justify the atrocities, how so, etc. Full details and materials sent later on.
Requirements: 1. Fully developed and unified paragraphs 2. An underlined structure 3. An introductory paragraph ending with a one-sentence thesis statement that sets up the argument for the rest of the essay to prove and defend. 4. 3 middle paragraphs, each beginning with a one-sentence argumentative topic sentence 5. a concluding paragraph is optional, but cannot replace one of the mandatory middle paragraphs 6. formal tone and point of view 7. do not use/include any references to the author or to readers 8. the content must be based on textual analysis; do not write about or include any “life in general” ideas, which will be off topic, or points based on speculation. 9. quotations are needed for support of your analysis; they must be correctly integrated, formatted, and documented MLA style 10.do not use outside/secondary sources 11.a Works Cited page is not needed unless you are not using the class text, the Dover edition 12.Do not include in the thesis statement or in the middle section any analysis that argues or tries to prove that the narrator is a psychopath or insane. the essay to show your knowledge of how well you can read a literary text and how well you can write a good analysis of a literary text. ’t forget to proofread for grammatical errors. Please select one from any of two topics: 1. “The Tell-Tale Heart”: A Case of Murder Not Insanity Or: 2. “The Black Cat”: A Parody of Confession I have uploaded pdf text for both topics. Please don’t change the topic and use the topic provided. Thank you.
Hello! This is a book report on Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon. This is for an AP Lit class. The rubric included came directly from AP so it lists the different types of rubrics. Only pages 8-10 of the PDF apply here. It should be a standard five paragraph essay; introduction with a thesis, three body paragraphs with evidence supporting the prompt and commentary, and a conclusion that includes a real-world tie to the essay and prompt. The prompts are also included. There’s no preference, so writer’s choice. Thank you so much!
Argue that in at least two of John Keats’s Odes the poet expresses a strong longing for death. Your essay will be judged on how well you have incorporated quotations and offered interpretations to support your thesis; structured your argument; avoided grammar and mechanics mistakes and mistakes of logic; and adhered to the conventions of essay writing. Be sure to structure your essay appropriately (in expository essay form): Body Paragraphs are governed by topic sentences and each contains at least two subtopic details. The Concluding Paragraph goes from specific (restatement of thesis in different words) back out to general discussion, which is the opposite direction to the way the Introductory Paragraph went.
Please write a detailed essay plan discussing two texts that engage with the place of women in society. “The waiter’s wife ” by Zadie Smith and “Bliss ” by Katherine Mansfield the plan should have: A clear argument with Clearly outlined paragraphs that contribute to the argument using Quotations from primary and secondary sources.
Final 8-page essay, double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman. Track a common image, figure, or motif in two to three texts. How does this figure change or transform across those texts? How does it remain the same? What does the use of this figure enable us to understand—might we synthesize its appearance across multiple texts into a broader definition or argument? My current plan is to use “The Communal Luxury” by Kristin Ross and “Poetry is not a luxury” by Audre Lorde to explore and compare the themes of luxury and ornaments in the texts. Some guiding questions that I thought of are: Are luxury and ornament the same? Is luxury used to develop oneself? How are these used in Communal Luxury and Poetry is not a Luxury? Is luxury an ornamentation of life or something else? In Poetry is not a Luxury, Is Audre Lorde seeking something like communal luxury or leading towards something like an ornament? Please refer to the attachments for the pdf of both texts and my (poorly written) previous essay for The Communal Luxury to get the ideas of the materials and how I write. And please don’t copy paste words from my previous essays to this one.
Literature of Rebellion – “Voices of Change” poetry project, “podcast” or writing (DOING A WRITING, AN ESSAY) The pre and post WW 2 period was one of tremendous change in America and beyond, and two forces of changes had to do with human rights. Women’s history and Black history had voices that rose up and broke barriers. Rebellion in the 60s – usually associated with poems like “Howl” by Ginsberg, and much of the Woodstock revolution, was seeded by political, social, and artistic voices who blazed an intellectual and personal trail of change. Poetry seems to be a literary form that does not cause revolutions, and rebellious poets seem to be figures with berets and inconsequential folk musicians. Yet poems have shaped our consciousness in more ways than we know. Bob Dylan won the Nobel Prize for Literature in recent years, and past winners have been voices of rebellion, too. You have read poems from a variety of voices and in your resources section, have access to many others – Lorde, Plath, Sexton, Rich, Clifton, Dove, Hooks, Hughes, to name a few – as well as poets who are not listed in this unit. You are not restricted to the poets in the resources. Pick a poet post WW1 who appeals to you who rebelled against societal norms, specifically ones of gender, race and/or class, and do a deep dive into the works. Selecting 3 poems and/or 2 poems and an essay or other work (ie: song, painting, etc. by the artist), create a short “poetry guide” to your “voice of change,” establishing what the central fulcrum of the VOICE of rebellion is, where can we find it, and what is its end result (ie: is it a successful or fruitful voice of change). In your project, you must trace a central theme/motif of rebellion and examine it across works, weaving in autobiography and history as well where appropriate. There are no limits to how you present the VOICE but you must give the poet’s voice clarity for a reader, give the reader a sense of the voice itself, why and how it is a voice of change, what changes does it foster in the reader/listener, and then be sure you also give us a sense of the “poet’s own sense of his/her/their” own voice and what the poet thinks (or at least might think, as different from the speaker in the poems) about the rebellion, and what is asks of us, the reader, and where it will lead us, or not. Be sure to give some sense as to why your 3 poems (or 2 poems and another work) go together to accomplish your goal, which is to make us FEEL and hear and understand the VOICE of change you have chosen to listen to and represent. You may write this, or do a podcast of it, or choose another medium(s) (with teacher approval) to accomplish the goal. (alternative option might be that you may also, if you choose, do a comparative study of 2 poems and then create a third one in imitation of your poet as your third work, incorporating it into your study as well). Due after break.